|
A (horrible) Question of Ethics | by Illiad | 2008-04-28 08:51:02 |
|
*both* decisions are the same. | by perlcat45 | 2008-04-28 09:13:12 |
|
They're not the same | by MatthewDBA | 2008-04-28 09:16:05 |
|
I disagree. | by Pic | 2008-04-28 09:29:09 |
|
"Certainty that either..." | by MatthewDBA | 2008-04-28 09:42:41 |
| "ethics isn't about numbers or probability." |
by perlcat45 |
2008-04-28 10:18:05 |
| ...and that's what makes them the same. You're in the game of probability and asked to treat it as a certainty(that's what ethics are). Even the 'certain' option is a probability, as you do not know which child will be saved. As humans, we don't want to answer the question as posed, but the question as we view it. However, as posed, it's probability either way. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
What do you mean by | by MatthewDBA | 2008-04-28 10:19:56 |
|
You're in the game of probabilty | by perlcat45 | 2008-04-28 10:28:13 |
|
I don't follow | by MatthewDBA | 2008-04-28 10:33:05 |
|
Thank $deity you aren't my doctor.(n/t) | by perlcat45 | 2008-04-28 10:36:26 |
|
Whether a decision is right or wrong | by MatthewDBA | 2008-04-28 10:41:31 |
|
I do believe Solomon answered that qn | by perlcat45 | 2008-04-28 10:49:06 |
|
I believe that the question Solomon answered | by MatthewDBA | 2008-04-28 10:56:24 |
|
That is a highly unfair question to ask parents. | by subbywan | 2008-04-28 10:48:17 |
|
You don't ask them. | by perlcat45 | 2008-04-28 10:53:22 |
|
How will explain the situation change it? | by subbywan | 2008-04-28 10:55:48 |
|
Again, the situation is that: | by perlcat45 | 2008-04-28 11:07:28 |
|
What, exactly, is the "RNG"? | by MatthewDBA | 2008-04-28 11:22:38 |
|
Play nethack sometime | by perlcat45 | 2008-04-28 11:33:37 |
|
What random number generator? | by MatthewDBA | 2008-04-28 12:00:53 |
|
omnipotent is as omnipotent does | by perlcat45 | 2008-04-28 12:03:43 |
|
True; | by MatthewDBA | 2008-04-28 12:08:23 |
|
I still don't see how it was not in your hands (n/ (n/t) | by MatthewDBA | 2008-04-28 10:57:11 |
|
Responses: | by Nath3 | 2008-04-28 11:36:35 |
|
In real life, you're correct | by MatthewDBA | 2008-04-28 11:42:20 |
|
I answered elsewhere in the thread: | by Nath3 | 2008-04-28 13:43:14 |
|
I read that, | by MatthewDBA | 2008-04-28 14:01:37 |
|
I disagree | by subbywan | 2008-04-28 11:59:11 |
|
Matter of trust. | by perlcat45 | 2008-04-28 13:08:59 |
|
Which is exactly why it's unfair to present the | by subbywan | 2008-04-28 13:16:38 |
|
I doubt I'll convince you, but... | by Nath3 | 2008-04-28 13:40:47 |
|
but this isn't that situation. | by subbywan | 2008-04-28 13:51:01 |
|
But they do have different goals. | by Nath3 | 2008-04-28 14:12:58 |
|
It's still just passing the buck. | by subbywan | 2008-04-28 14:15:40 |
|
Is it passing the buck... | by Nath3 | 2008-04-28 14:22:11 |
|
Yes, it is. | by subbywan | 2008-04-28 14:53:58 |
|
I fear I'm repeating myself. | by Nath3 | 2008-04-28 15:03:54 |
|
Why? | by subbywan | 2008-04-28 15:06:06 |
|
But that *isn't* the only difference. | by Nath3 | 2008-04-28 15:09:11 |
|
And who in their right mind | by subbywan | 2008-04-28 15:25:34 |
|
That isn't the scenario described in the OP. | by Nath3 | 2008-04-28 15:30:46 |
|
I guess we're going to have to disagree on that :) (n/t) | by subbywan | 2008-04-28 15:39:41 |
|
I guess so. | by Nath3 | 2008-04-28 15:52:27 |
|
Saved at the cost of another life? | by FST777 | 2008-04-28 18:25:03 |