|
A (horrible) Question of Ethics | by Illiad | 2008-04-28 08:51:02 |
| *both* decisions are the same. |
by perlcat45 |
2008-04-28 09:13:12 |
When it's a 50/50 chance either way, ethically speaking, you're off the hook. Certainly with the "give both the same vaccine" you have a chance of having the optimal result, but that's like saying that a couple with 7 daughters' 8th child will be a son. It doesn't matter, because by your own definition, it is a 50/50 chance, outside your control. When it's down to such a choice, your best option is to recognize that the choice is out of your hands, make sure the parents understand why you're doing what you're doing, and flip a coin or take a stab at it -- either way, you were off the hook before you even made a decision.
You cannot take responsibility for the RNG. The RNG gives, the RNG takes (and usually with a gnome with a wand of death and an amulet of lifesaving). |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
They're not the same | by MatthewDBA | 2008-04-28 09:16:05 |
|
Exactly. (n/t) | by esbita | 2008-04-28 09:17:15 |
|
I disagree. | by Pic | 2008-04-28 09:29:09 |
|
"Certainty that either..." | by MatthewDBA | 2008-04-28 09:42:41 |
|
"ethics isn't about numbers or probability." | by perlcat45 | 2008-04-28 10:18:05 |
|
What do you mean by | by MatthewDBA | 2008-04-28 10:19:56 |
|
You're in the game of probabilty | by perlcat45 | 2008-04-28 10:28:13 |
|
I don't follow | by MatthewDBA | 2008-04-28 10:33:05 |
|
Thank $deity you aren't my doctor.(n/t) | by perlcat45 | 2008-04-28 10:36:26 |
|
Whether a decision is right or wrong | by MatthewDBA | 2008-04-28 10:41:31 |
|
I do believe Solomon answered that qn | by perlcat45 | 2008-04-28 10:49:06 |
|
I believe that the question Solomon answered | by MatthewDBA | 2008-04-28 10:56:24 |
|
That is a highly unfair question to ask parents. | by subbywan | 2008-04-28 10:48:17 |
|
You don't ask them. | by perlcat45 | 2008-04-28 10:53:22 |
|
How will explain the situation change it? | by subbywan | 2008-04-28 10:55:48 |
|
Again, the situation is that: | by perlcat45 | 2008-04-28 11:07:28 |
|
What, exactly, is the "RNG"? | by MatthewDBA | 2008-04-28 11:22:38 |
|
Play nethack sometime | by perlcat45 | 2008-04-28 11:33:37 |
|
What random number generator? | by MatthewDBA | 2008-04-28 12:00:53 |
|
omnipotent is as omnipotent does | by perlcat45 | 2008-04-28 12:03:43 |
|
True; | by MatthewDBA | 2008-04-28 12:08:23 |
|
I still don't see how it was not in your hands (n/ (n/t) | by MatthewDBA | 2008-04-28 10:57:11 |
|
Responses: | by Nath3 | 2008-04-28 11:36:35 |
|
In real life, you're correct | by MatthewDBA | 2008-04-28 11:42:20 |
|
I answered elsewhere in the thread: | by Nath3 | 2008-04-28 13:43:14 |
|
I read that, | by MatthewDBA | 2008-04-28 14:01:37 |
|
I disagree | by subbywan | 2008-04-28 11:59:11 |
|
Matter of trust. | by perlcat45 | 2008-04-28 13:08:59 |
|
Which is exactly why it's unfair to present the | by subbywan | 2008-04-28 13:16:38 |
|
I doubt I'll convince you, but... | by Nath3 | 2008-04-28 13:40:47 |
|
but this isn't that situation. | by subbywan | 2008-04-28 13:51:01 |
|
But they do have different goals. | by Nath3 | 2008-04-28 14:12:58 |
|
It's still just passing the buck. | by subbywan | 2008-04-28 14:15:40 |
|
Is it passing the buck... | by Nath3 | 2008-04-28 14:22:11 |
|
Yes, it is. | by subbywan | 2008-04-28 14:53:58 |
|
I fear I'm repeating myself. | by Nath3 | 2008-04-28 15:03:54 |
|
Why? | by subbywan | 2008-04-28 15:06:06 |
|
But that *isn't* the only difference. | by Nath3 | 2008-04-28 15:09:11 |
|
And who in their right mind | by subbywan | 2008-04-28 15:25:34 |
|
That isn't the scenario described in the OP. | by Nath3 | 2008-04-28 15:30:46 |
|
I guess we're going to have to disagree on that :) (n/t) | by subbywan | 2008-04-28 15:39:41 |
|
I guess so. | by Nath3 | 2008-04-28 15:52:27 |
|
Saved at the cost of another life? | by FST777 | 2008-04-28 18:25:03 |
|
ethics isn't about ... probability?!?! Yes, it is. | by dire_lobo | 2008-04-28 10:22:06 |
|
Certainty of what? | by perlcat45 | 2008-04-28 09:31:43 |
|
Whether a situation is unwinnable | by MatthewDBA | 2008-04-28 09:37:43 |
|
It's not more ethical | by perlcat45 | 2008-04-28 10:11:36 |
|
In other words, | by MatthewDBA | 2008-04-28 10:24:37 |
|
I agree with you; see my answer to the TLP | by romandas | 2008-04-28 12:36:48 |
|
*cough*kobiyashimaru*cough* (n/t) | by Phoon | 2008-04-28 09:43:11 |