UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Order from chaos	by nix	2008-04-28 00:09:30
I'd say watches are far less complex than cells.	by toysbfun	2008-04-28 00:30:22
Whatches could never evolve	by oldphart	2008-04-28 07:04:54
There has to be some breeding-success feedback for evolution to work. Mechanisms that do not replicate themselves cannot evolve - but they can be evolved by somebody (watchmakers) who get feedback (from the market) about which design is best. All living organisms we have found are relatively minor variations over one original development. The biochemistry of bacteria is close enugh to human biochemistry that it is possible to add genes for human hormones to bacteria in order to manufacture them. I would say that lifeforms which cannot evolve will lose out to those which can evolve. That is why we do not observe any non-evolutionary species!
[ Reply ]

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)