| Since we are almost in a recession |
by imrambi |
2008-03-20 11:48:51 |
Lets raise the gas tax!
Smart idea to curb green house gases, but the only ones that this hurts is the little man who can't afford the hybrid vehicles. People that fall into this are those that are already struggling.
Hey, Dingell, look where you state is compared to all the other states. Its the worst! |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
What's this "almost" crap? | by y2kdragon | 2008-03-20 11:52:30 |
|
It's how the Govt justifies their statements :P (n/t) | by subbywan | 2008-03-20 11:57:38 |
|
oO (n/t) | by CynicalRyan | 2008-03-20 11:57:42 |
|
If we're not going to use the definition | by toysbfun | 2008-03-20 12:06:55 |
|
Because not even the committee that's responsible | by merlin | 2008-03-20 12:19:41 |
|
It's not a recession, it's just prices going up | by murphoid | 2008-03-20 12:05:36 |
|
Keep telling yourself that. (n/t) | by Didactylos | 2008-03-20 12:08:29 |
|
Where's the contraction of the US economy? | by CynicalRyan | 2008-03-20 12:20:36 |
|
What areas is it expanding in though? | by subbywan | 2008-03-20 12:44:52 |
|
Expansion is irrelevant for a discussion | by CynicalRyan | 2008-03-20 12:48:10 |
|
Um, how is expansion irrelevant? | by merlin | 2008-03-20 12:49:23 |
|
in general, because expansion is evidence | by subbywan | 2008-03-20 12:52:39 |
|
Exactly. | by CynicalRyan | 2008-03-20 12:59:19 |
|
No, but you CAN have lying about the expansion. | by subbywan | 2008-03-20 13:00:25 |
|
A detailed post for that is | by CynicalRyan | 2008-03-20 13:09:05 |
|
already replied (n/t) | by subbywan | 2008-03-20 13:17:03 |
|
ditto. ;) (n/t) | by CynicalRyan | 2008-03-20 13:20:38 |
|
It may be relevant. | by subbywan | 2008-03-20 12:51:45 |
|
In that case, yes. | by CynicalRyan | 2008-03-20 13:07:49 |
|
Therein lies the trouble. | by subbywan | 2008-03-20 13:16:43 |
|
Of course. | by CynicalRyan | 2008-03-20 13:20:08 |
|
It all depends on where they get their source data | by subbywan | 2008-03-20 13:22:46 |
|
Could just mean, that everybody uses the same | by CynicalRyan | 2008-03-20 13:40:58 |
|
Yeah, but they're also French :P | by subbywan | 2008-03-20 13:46:00 |
|
As if the French loved the States. :P | by CynicalRyan | 2008-03-20 14:06:28 |
|
The US is seen as a entity in and of itself | by subbywan | 2008-03-20 14:10:18 |
|
Elaborate, please, with short words, if you can. | by CynicalRyan | 2008-03-20 14:12:42 |
|
Economically, the EU operates as a whole | by subbywan | 2008-03-20 14:23:41 |
|
This is not quite true, I think. | by CynicalRyan | 2008-03-20 14:35:56 |
|
The member states can be very diverse, but | by subbywan | 2008-03-20 14:46:08 |
|
Of course the US can do so. | by CynicalRyan | 2008-03-20 14:49:14 |
|
Even national security is tempered | by subbywan | 2008-03-20 15:03:04 |
|
Not all EU members are Schengen members. | by CynicalRyan | 2008-03-20 15:07:42 |
|
Yes, but the analogy holds. | by subbywan | 2008-03-20 15:09:31 |
|
My point: | by CynicalRyan | 2008-03-20 15:21:46 |
|
yes, you're talking past me :P | by subbywan | 2008-03-20 15:32:36 |
|
Well, I said that my perspective can be skewed. | by CynicalRyan | 2008-03-20 15:36:15 |
|
Actually, there are some aspects the US would do | by subbywan | 2008-03-20 15:38:49 |
|
Works both ways. (n/t) | by CynicalRyan | 2008-03-20 15:52:04 |
|
Price of flour's also up because wheat prices are | by toysbfun | 2008-03-20 12:09:35 |
|
As murphoid said: because of the ethanol | by UnFair | 2008-03-20 13:21:00 |
|
Actually unemployment numbers are up | by DesertRat66 | 2008-03-20 12:14:36 |
|
Yup my bad, just saw this | by murphoid | 2008-03-20 12:50:09 |
|
Do you know the technical definition | by merlin | 2008-03-20 12:20:47 |
|
OECD growth forecast is at 0%. | by CynicalRyan | 2008-03-20 12:25:58 |
|
And as I pointed out in another post, | by merlin | 2008-03-20 12:31:27 |
|
Ah, forecasts. | by Didactylos | 2008-03-20 12:34:59 |
|
Huh? Where did I ever mention forecasts? | by merlin | 2008-03-20 12:36:42 |
|
CynicalRyan was going on about them. | by Didactylos | 2008-03-20 12:41:44 |
|
Then provide proof that they aren't relevant. (n/t | by CynicalRyan | 2008-03-20 12:43:30 |
|
The simplest definition of recession | by CynicalRyan | 2008-03-20 12:42:53 |
|
Here's the official definition, from the NBER | by merlin | 2008-03-20 12:46:52 |
|
Close, but not quite: | by CynicalRyan | 2008-03-20 12:58:06 |
|
Well sorry Mr. CAPS (n/t) | by murphoid | 2008-03-20 12:50:50 |
|
My only point is that if you are going to make a | by merlin | 2008-03-20 12:54:39 |
|
LOL, ask a few economists, the majority are saying | by intrinsic | 2008-03-20 17:55:47 |
|
Bwahahahaha.... | by esbita | 2008-03-20 12:06:37 |
|
I'm in IL and have 42 each way. (n/t) | by crankshaft-jr | 2008-03-20 12:32:56 |
|
IL is talking about dropping the gas tax for the | by Spud | 2008-03-20 13:04:08 |
|
I smell an election year coming on | by emlaabs | 2008-03-20 14:35:32 |
|
Somehow, I'm not surprised | by testy | 2008-03-20 12:09:30 |
|
Not gonna happen | by oot | 2008-03-20 12:11:23 |
|
^^^I mean the tax (not the recession)^^^ (n/t) | by oot | 2008-03-20 12:13:21 |
|
Are you suggesting most would vote for recession? | by desiredusername | 2008-03-20 12:20:45 |
|
True, but... | by testy | 2008-03-20 12:17:51 |
|
I stopped reading at Rep. John Dingell. | by lheggland | 2008-03-20 12:36:34 |