The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
From the INBOX by ChuckAB 2007-11-29 05:14:14
Harvard Attention Test

*Quick Check for Early Alzheimer's

The following was developed as a mental age assessment by the School of Psychiatry at Harvard University Take your time and see if you can read each line aloud without a mistake.

The average person over 30 years of age cannot do it!
  1. This is this cat.
  2. This is is cat.
  3. This is how cat.
  4. This is to cat.
  5. This is keep cat.
  6. This is an cat.
  7. This is old cat.
  8. This is person cat.
  9. This is busy cat.
  10. This is for cat.
  11. This is forty cat.
  12. This is seconds cat.
Now go back and read the third word in each line from the top down and I betcha' ya can't resist passing it on.
[ Reply ]
  And now to go to wrok (n/t) by ChuckAB2007-11-29 05:14:34
    When did the word "wrok" come up? I have seen ... by MuscleOwl2007-11-29 05:37:25
      It's like twisting the spelling on a cuss word.... by kiwifruit2007-11-29 05:51:55
        For me as a Dutchy it has double that meaning by ttlogic2007-11-29 06:08:39
        Well SaleGamine and I started saying by Spisefisken2007-11-29 06:21:50
          Typo. Like the "mpnkey" posts. by Adiplomat2007-11-29 06:34:43
            You've been here longer, old chap by Spisefisken2007-11-29 06:47:29
            Wow, I haven't seen you in ages. by ErniePi2007-11-29 06:53:14
          I went for W*rk (n/t) by Treehugger2007-11-29 07:48:35
      Probably as a parallel to "pr0n". (n/t) by Phoon2007-11-29 06:10:49
  See ya :) by NDwight2007-11-29 05:18:17

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)