|
RE: Fred and top sirloin (ridiculously long) | by SlyW | 2007-10-22 08:10:59 |
|
Wow, what a lot of hypotheticals. | by Didactylos | 2007-10-22 08:37:22 |
|
See my reply, Canada's system has good outcomes (n/t) | by cristobal | 2007-10-22 08:43:23 |
|
Yes indeed. | by Didactylos | 2007-10-22 08:46:22 |
|
If theory is wrong then why is Canada shifting? | by SlyW | 2007-10-22 09:02:08 |
|
Rich people like convenience. | by Didactylos | 2007-10-22 09:14:06 |
|
"Stupidly low taxes" ??? | by SlyW | 2007-10-22 09:21:23 |
|
You do know you have low taxes, right? | by Didactylos | 2007-10-22 09:27:52 |
|
Umm, yeah! | by DesertRat66 | 2007-10-22 09:31:58 |
|
Ooh, I know this one! | by dodrian | 2007-10-22 09:39:39 |
|
This says more about your rich/poor divide | by Didactylos | 2007-10-22 09:50:27 |
|
Our "poor" are rich by world standards. | by lheggland | 2007-10-22 09:57:15 |
|
Wishful thinking, I'm afraid. (n/t) | by Didactylos | 2007-10-22 10:09:25 |
|
Lets think about this, | by lheggland | 2007-10-22 10:28:59 |
|
I was comparing the US with other first world | by Didactylos | 2007-10-22 10:38:50 |
|
The first time I ever saw poeple living | by lheggland | 2007-10-22 10:54:50 |
|
Have you ever BEEN on welfare? | by SnArL | 2007-10-22 11:12:35 |
|
My best friend was for some time | by DesertRat66 | 2007-10-22 11:23:27 |
|
That's a vastly different experience than what MY | by SnArL | 2007-10-22 11:33:52 |
|
Trouble is, states set the benefit levels. | by esbita | 2007-10-22 11:42:39 |
|
And a state that pays well, often gets flooded | by subbywan | 2007-10-22 11:47:33 |
| That's really messed up |
by SnArL |
2007-10-22 11:59:11 |
| However, on the other side of the coin, the folks in Washington aren't intimately familiar with how much money is needed to survive in each area. Apparently, the state governments don't know, either. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
All the more reason the feds should stay out of | by subbywan | 2007-10-22 12:07:51 |
|
I agree wholehartedly (n/t) | by SnArL | 2007-10-22 12:20:33 |