|
RE: Fred and top sirloin (ridiculously long) | by SlyW | 2007-10-22 08:10:59 |
| Wow, what a lot of hypotheticals. |
by Didactylos |
2007-10-22 08:37:22 |
I don't think you need to guess. Throughout the world, many health care systems have been tried.
Looking at these other systems, my conclusion is that (like Democracy) socialised health care is the WORST possible system - except for all the others that have been tried.
Taking a look at the US (a country with, in my opinion, the worst health care of any first world country) - all the money goes to the HMOs and pharmaceuticals. By comparison, MediCare is amazingly cheap and efficient. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
See my reply, Canada's system has good outcomes (n/t) | by cristobal | 2007-10-22 08:43:23 |
|
Yes indeed. | by Didactylos | 2007-10-22 08:46:22 |
|
If theory is wrong then why is Canada shifting? | by SlyW | 2007-10-22 09:02:08 |
|
Rich people like convenience. | by Didactylos | 2007-10-22 09:14:06 |
|
BWAHAHAHAHA!!!! | by esbita | 2007-10-22 09:16:46 |
|
What part of my post has caused you mirth? (n/t) | by Didactylos | 2007-10-22 09:19:01 |
|
I'd wager pretty much the whole thing | by DesertRat66 | 2007-10-22 09:23:44 |
|
Mainly the 3rd paragraph. | by esbita | 2007-10-22 09:29:20 |
|
You need a viewpoint shift. | by Didactylos | 2007-10-22 09:39:37 |
|
You also need to figure in Malpractice insurance | by Classic_Jon | 2007-10-22 09:43:50 |
|
Here is an example of where some of the money goes | by vdp | 2007-10-22 09:45:52 |
|
And your point? | by lheggland | 2007-10-22 09:50:31 |
|
Someone is confusing non-profit | by DesertRat66 | 2007-10-22 09:56:01 |
|
Cheap? Half of healthcare is *already* paid | by esbita | 2007-10-22 09:49:48 |
|
"Stupidly low taxes" ??? | by SlyW | 2007-10-22 09:21:23 |
|
You do know you have low taxes, right? | by Didactylos | 2007-10-22 09:27:52 |
|
Umm, yeah! | by DesertRat66 | 2007-10-22 09:31:58 |
|
Ooh, I know this one! | by dodrian | 2007-10-22 09:39:39 |
|
Close enough | by DesertRat66 | 2007-10-22 09:46:41 |
|
I'd like to see a study done | by dodrian | 2007-10-22 09:53:00 |
|
This says more about your rich/poor divide | by Didactylos | 2007-10-22 09:50:27 |
|
Our poor enjoy a negative tax rate | by esbita | 2007-10-22 09:51:47 |
|
Our "poor" are rich by world standards. | by lheggland | 2007-10-22 09:57:15 |
|
Wishful thinking, I'm afraid. (n/t) | by Didactylos | 2007-10-22 10:09:25 |
|
Not. Even. Close. To. Wishful. Thinking. | by DesertRat66 | 2007-10-22 10:21:01 |
|
That stuff is all really nice | by SnArL | 2007-10-22 11:09:06 |
|
You can't MAKE people buy food | by subbywan | 2007-10-22 11:11:29 |
|
Hold up, there | by SnArL | 2007-10-22 12:04:06 |
|
But you COULD sell it. (n/t) | by subbywan | 2007-10-22 12:06:48 |
|
Correction: | by MatthewDBA | 2007-10-22 12:10:46 |
|
Not at all. | by subbywan | 2007-10-22 12:13:34 |
|
Depends on where you live | by MatthewDBA | 2007-10-22 12:33:25 |
|
It's not optimism. | by subbywan | 2007-10-22 12:44:50 |
|
Maybe it's different experience | by MatthewDBA | 2007-10-22 12:56:30 |
|
Welfare =! Unemployment Insurance | by lheggland | 2007-10-22 12:19:26 |
|
The link also covers food and nutrition | by DesertRat66 | 2007-10-22 11:26:06 |
|
Lets think about this, | by lheggland | 2007-10-22 10:28:59 |
|
I was comparing the US with other first world | by Didactylos | 2007-10-22 10:38:50 |
|
You are naive | by subbywan | 2007-10-22 10:44:57 |
|
It's not clear from the source | by MatthewDBA | 2007-10-22 10:52:15 |
|
Census Bureau Poverty Level | by Stuka | 2007-10-22 10:56:20 |
|
The census shouldn't define "poor" | by subbywan | 2007-10-22 10:56:56 |
|
The Bureau of the Census | by MatthewDBA | 2007-10-22 11:03:55 |
|
fair enough :) (n/t) | by subbywan | 2007-10-22 11:05:13 |
|
It sounds like you're focusing on relative poverty | by esbita | 2007-10-22 10:47:03 |
|
The average poor American has more living space | by DesertRat66 | 2007-10-22 10:52:51 |
|
Question: Where in your previous statements do | by Classic_Jon | 2007-10-22 10:54:06 |
|
Sorry, the claim was in lheggland's post | by Didactylos | 2007-10-22 10:57:06 |
|
Understood, I didn't see it and thought I would | by Classic_Jon | 2007-10-22 11:10:18 |
|
The first time I ever saw poeple living | by lheggland | 2007-10-22 10:54:50 |
|
Have you ever BEEN on welfare? | by SnArL | 2007-10-22 11:12:35 |
|
My best friend was for some time | by DesertRat66 | 2007-10-22 11:23:27 |
|
The rules have changed *somewhat* since then. | by esbita | 2007-10-22 11:25:47 |
|
Yeah, He got caught in that | by DesertRat66 | 2007-10-22 11:30:11 |
|
That's a vastly different experience than what MY | by SnArL | 2007-10-22 11:33:52 |
|
Trouble is, states set the benefit levels. | by esbita | 2007-10-22 11:42:39 |
|
And a state that pays well, often gets flooded | by subbywan | 2007-10-22 11:47:33 |
|
That's really messed up | by SnArL | 2007-10-22 11:59:11 |
|
All the more reason the feds should stay out of | by subbywan | 2007-10-22 12:07:51 |
|
I agree wholehartedly (n/t) | by SnArL | 2007-10-22 12:20:33 |
|
The GF you met is on food assistance | by Classic_Jon | 2007-10-22 11:27:11 |
|
I've known other people who CAN'T feed their | by SnArL | 2007-10-22 12:25:00 |
|
Are they on the Lone star card or do they get $ ? | by Classic_Jon | 2007-10-22 12:34:20 |
|
These people were in Phoenix | by SnArL | 2007-10-22 13:16:56 |
|
Ahh, yes, My sister used to teach there... | by Classic_Jon | 2007-10-22 15:13:24 |
|
Nope, | by lheggland | 2007-10-22 11:34:13 |
|
Most welfare folk aren't the problem | by subbywan | 2007-10-22 11:41:01 |
|
Yup | by SnArL | 2007-10-22 11:55:31 |
|
No. Just not naive. See DR's posting. (n/t) | by subbywan | 2007-10-22 10:31:22 |
|
Yes, | by dodrian | 2007-10-22 09:34:20 |
|
Yes. Don't you want lower taxes? | by SlyW | 2007-10-22 09:37:00 |
|
And funny how Ireland's been growing. | by esbita | 2007-10-22 09:39:06 |
|
Because I really enjoy | by Didactylos | 2007-10-22 09:44:54 |
|
And what is the incentive to improve the system? ( (n/t) | by SlyW | 2007-10-22 09:49:31 |
|
Lower taxes, better quality services. | by Didactylos | 2007-10-22 09:58:56 |
|
The only problem with that is that politicians | by Classic_Jon | 2007-10-22 10:04:43 |
|
In other words | by DesertRat66 | 2007-10-22 10:04:57 |
|
A problem with politicians is, | by dodrian | 2007-10-22 10:54:17 |
|
no one in america is refused | by tesla_koil | 2007-10-22 09:22:37 |
|
It has, *BUT* | by subbywan | 2007-10-22 10:27:37 |
|
"MediCare is amazingly cheap and efficient" | by lheggland | 2007-10-22 08:46:16 |
|
Prove it. | by Didactylos | 2007-10-22 08:48:06 |
|
Oh, and Google provides | by Didactylos | 2007-10-22 08:53:12 |
|
Come sit at my desk. | by esbita | 2007-10-22 08:59:39 |
|
Or talk to the GF's Mom who works the | by Classic_Jon | 2007-10-22 09:49:20 |
|
You forgot the "By comparison" (n/t) | by MatthewDBA | 2007-10-22 08:48:24 |
|
Medicare *is* "cheap and efficient" | by Stuka | 2007-10-22 09:06:23 |
|
I never said it was *good*.... | by Didactylos | 2007-10-22 09:17:36 |
|
Misdirection by design | by Stibbons | 2007-10-22 10:02:25 |
|
They also forget about the third party billers. | by lheggland | 2007-10-22 10:09:00 |