The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
Should those who slurp WiFi be jailed? by Illiad2007-10-08 11:34:07
  Yes. by CynicalRyan2007-10-08 11:41:32
    Agree, with second part anyway. Besides, if by taitano2007-10-08 11:45:22
      If you leave your house's door open, by CynicalRyan2007-10-08 11:46:47
        Different situation by subbywan2007-10-08 11:47:56
          How don't I have that claim? by CynicalRyan2007-10-08 11:51:33
            Because you're technically broadcasting. by shadowsystems2007-10-08 12:00:56
              Which means that the system is wrong. by CynicalRyan 2007-10-08 12:04:48
Besides, you cannot actively broadcast on a WiFi network, without first connecting to it. (Yes, there are ways around that, but they rely on circumventing the hand-shake protocol between AP and client).

Unlike, say, CB.
[ Reply ]
                The owner of the AP is actively broadcasting by joecrouse2007-10-08 12:17:02
                  Actually, it is not "actively broadcasting". by CynicalRyan2007-10-08 12:20:57
                    CMIFAW. An unsecured AP is actively distributing by joecrouse2007-10-08 12:23:13
                    You have to set that up. by subbywan2007-10-08 12:24:53
                      When setting up an AP, You are litteraly asked by taitano2007-10-08 12:38:48
                        Like a trucker's CB radio. (n/t) by taitano2007-10-08 12:39:31
                        nope, not with many of them by Freakazoid2007-10-08 14:22:29
                          Yep, and many of them end up connecting by ToLazyToThink2007-10-08 16:50:03

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)