|
Should those who slurp WiFi be jailed? | by Illiad | 2007-10-08 11:34:07 |
| Yes. |
by CynicalRyan |
2007-10-08 11:41:32 |
It's not their's to use, and is used without consent, unless the AP made it clear that it can be used for access by third parties.
And if the internet access used is volume based, we are entering the area of theft.. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Agree, with second part anyway. Besides, if | by taitano | 2007-10-08 11:45:22 |
|
If you leave your house's door open, | by CynicalRyan | 2007-10-08 11:46:47 |
|
Different situation | by subbywan | 2007-10-08 11:47:56 |
|
How don't I have that claim? | by CynicalRyan | 2007-10-08 11:51:33 |
|
Because you're technically broadcasting. | by shadowsystems | 2007-10-08 12:00:56 |
|
Which means that the system is wrong. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-10-08 12:04:48 |
|
The owner of the AP is actively broadcasting | by joecrouse | 2007-10-08 12:17:02 |
|
Actually, it is not "actively broadcasting". | by CynicalRyan | 2007-10-08 12:20:57 |
|
CMIFAW. An unsecured AP is actively distributing | by joecrouse | 2007-10-08 12:23:13 |
|
You have to set that up. | by subbywan | 2007-10-08 12:24:53 |
|
When setting up an AP, You are litteraly asked | by taitano | 2007-10-08 12:38:48 |
|
Like a trucker's CB radio. (n/t) | by taitano | 2007-10-08 12:39:31 |
|
nope, not with many of them | by Freakazoid | 2007-10-08 14:22:29 |
|
Yep, and many of them end up connecting | by ToLazyToThink | 2007-10-08 16:50:03 |
|
Because you're broadcasting into THEIR space | by subbywan | 2007-10-08 12:08:13 |
|
Not as I understand it. | by Irrelevant | 2007-10-08 14:34:26 |
|
Come to think of it, you sound like my grand pa... | by taitano | 2007-10-08 11:48:09 |
|
Only if it's volume-based | by subbywan | 2007-10-08 11:46:52 |
|
Not with the general cries for a "computer | by CynicalRyan | 2007-10-08 11:49:45 |
|
Oh yes. Definitely | by subbywan | 2007-10-08 11:58:08 |
|
Yes it does excuse them. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-10-08 12:00:35 |
|
Nope. | by subbywan | 2007-10-08 12:10:50 |
|
No, it's not. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-10-08 12:18:10 |
|
perhaps that's a german thing :P | by subbywan | 2007-10-08 12:25:52 |
|
I wish.. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-10-08 13:30:14 |
|
Then there's no excuse not to expect the customer | by subbywan | 2007-10-08 13:34:41 |
|
They'll call teh support hotline. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-10-08 13:45:53 |
|
It's not an obvious problem. | by subbywan | 2007-10-08 13:50:03 |
|
It is an obvious problem. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-10-08 13:54:20 |
|
it *is* a best practice to secure your router. | by subbywan | 2007-10-08 13:57:53 |
|
It is a best practice in corporate environments. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-10-08 14:02:51 |
|
As are corporate ones. | by subbywan | 2007-10-08 14:06:18 |
|
We are arguing past each other, methinks. (n/t) | by CynicalRyan | 2007-10-08 15:10:47 |
|
yep. You need to see my point, dammit, | by subbywan | 2007-10-08 15:16:06 |
|
Only if you do it first. :D (n/t) | by CynicalRyan | 2007-10-08 16:11:06 |
|
Already have! | by subbywan | 2007-10-08 16:15:11 |
|
You? Three laughs to that! | by CynicalRyan | 2007-10-08 16:28:59 |
|
Umm...That game analogy analogy doesn't work. | by ToLazyToThink | 2007-10-08 16:56:24 |
|
Not anyone. | by Illiad | 2007-10-08 11:50:53 |
|
Even in general. | by subbywan | 2007-10-08 12:06:42 |
|
I can agree with that. | by Illiad | 2007-10-08 12:18:15 |
|
Because there's not always a way to know | by subbywan | 2007-10-08 12:23:42 |
|
The default behaviour... | by Illiad | 2007-10-08 12:29:41 |
|
Arrogant, absolutely | by subbywan | 2007-10-08 12:33:14 |
|
It's illegal in Texas. See my other post for cite (n/t) | by merlin | 2007-10-08 12:34:37 |
|
*nods* but not everywhere | by subbywan | 2007-10-08 12:39:57 |
|
What about the laziness on the part of the | by merlin | 2007-10-08 12:42:58 |
|
He shouldn't. And he is leeching | by subbywan | 2007-10-08 12:45:17 |
|
implied consent? | by unjust | 2007-10-08 17:01:21 |
