The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

what's faster for low end system, XP or 2000 ? by dennismv2007-10-05 15:06:57
  define: "low end system" by Freakazoid2007-10-05 15:12:21
    define by dennismv2007-10-05 15:52:35
      2K. Or maybe even 9x. by UmbralRaptor2007-10-05 16:00:05
        9x doesn't handle processors that fast very well, by themadkansan 2007-10-05 17:07:09
if at all.

Gona hafta suggest Win2K and see if you can get some cheap RAM to stick in it - it will run with 128MB, just very, =very= slowly.
[ Reply ]
          It should handle them decently. by UmbralRaptor2007-10-05 17:21:49
            What's the system 2b used for? (n/t) by taitano2007-10-05 17:34:16
              high-tech computations by dennismv2007-10-05 18:43:09
                Either one then. (n/t) by taitano2007-10-05 20:34:37

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)