| Ahhh, I love finding an account in Active Director |
by hadji |
2007-10-05 11:52:35 |
y for a non-employee (i.e. contractor) with no description, no contact info, no manager, no expiration date, and VPN access.
w00t! \o/
Sooooo . . . now that I've disabled it, let's see who, if anyone, calls and complains. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
HEY! Who closed the back door?!?! | by Dire_Lobo | 2007-10-05 11:59:55 |
|
If noone whines, it's probably a cracker. I'da | by taitano | 2007-10-05 12:24:35 |
|
Remind me to not have you administrate my | by CynicalRyan | 2007-10-05 12:26:05 |
|
Yeah, I'd probably abuse the users. Suff like | by taitano | 2007-10-05 12:31:20 |
|
Then get all snooty on em for | by taitano | 2007-10-05 12:33:50 |
|
That, too. (n/t) | by CynicalRyan | 2007-10-05 12:33:52 |
|
Yeah, I like to leave boobytrapped back | by taitano | 2007-10-05 12:37:41 |
|
Or any server environment other than your own. (n/ (n/t) | by CynicalRyan | 2007-10-05 12:38:21 |
|
For me it's especially dangerous because my | by taitano | 2007-10-05 12:46:04 |
|
I guess, I'll have to quarantine any emails I'd | by CynicalRyan | 2007-10-05 12:47:37 |
|
Nah, only the attatchments. I use yahoo. | by taitano | 2007-10-05 12:55:23 |
|
The invite is only for those who get past the pot. (n/t) | by taitano | 2007-10-05 12:38:47 |
|
No, it's not a cracker. It was set up for a | by hadji | 2007-10-05 12:42:18 |
|
Frustrating. Still, something to do. I's not like | by taitano | 2007-10-05 12:50:02 |
|
aplying WOD policies? | by joresgump | 2007-10-05 12:51:29 |
|
Not globally, but when I have nothing to follow up | by hadji | 2007-10-05 12:52:29 |
|
And I'm sure... | by imperito | 2007-10-05 12:45:44 |
|
Depending on the risks involved | by CynicalRyan | 2007-10-05 12:50:21 |
|
Heh... | by imperito | 2007-10-05 12:56:36 |
|
I don't like impeding business, I like | by hadji | 2007-10-05 13:03:25 |
|
See, here I just found another account that is | by hadji | 2007-10-05 13:06:34 |
|
An improperly setup acct. may not be an open | by taitano | 2007-10-05 13:02:51 |
|
That's not my problem. | by hadji | 2007-10-05 13:00:44 |
|
Heh... | by imperito | 2007-10-05 13:08:42 |
|
Not at all. You're missing the point. | by hadji | 2007-10-05 13:12:48 |
|
Well there was a ticking bomb in the corner.... | by jeff_uk | 2007-10-05 13:32:01 |
|
'The hit in schedule'? | by jeff_uk | 2007-10-05 13:38:16 |
|
Are you finding many accounts that have been | by Peace_man | 2007-10-05 13:28:56 |
|
DSQUERY USER is perfect for that! (n/t) | by jeff_uk | 2007-10-05 13:36:06 |
|
I have very few accounts so far where I have no | by hadji | 2007-10-05 13:41:45 |
|
Yeah, I keep forgetting that your environment | by Peace_man | 2007-10-05 13:48:45 |
|
Oh, we don't review all accounts. | by hadji | 2007-10-05 13:54:43 |
|
That sounds like an interesting report. | by Peace_man | 2007-10-05 14:54:15 |
|
Not sure I can answer that. | by hadji | 2007-10-05 15:13:17 |
|
Disable/unplug/delete/hide/move it and see who | by jeff_uk | 2007-10-05 13:35:08 |
|
Don't they have a remote users policy? | by jeff_uk | 2007-10-05 13:41:26 |
|
Our policies are not really carved in stone. | by hadji | 2007-10-05 13:44:07 |
|
Pull the plug and see who complains. | by RetiQlum2 | 2007-10-05 13:57:10 |
|
When was the last time s/he logged in? (n/t) | by ChuckAB | 2007-10-05 15:14:07 |
