| Richard Dawkins "The Enemies of Reason' on UK TV |
by jeff_uk |
2007-08-08 10:28:29 |
Channel 4, Part 1 on monday 13th, part 2 the week after.
Should be interesting :) |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Not impressed with Dawkins, since he doesn't under | by shminux | 2007-08-08 10:36:46 |
|
How can they not be opposite? | by jeff_uk | 2007-08-08 10:55:22 |
|
The problems really only come out when | by Peace_man | 2007-08-08 11:00:07 |
|
Dawkins addresses this, too. | by Phoon | 2007-08-08 11:07:12 |
|
Heh. Maybe I'm interpreting things wrong. | by Peace_man | 2007-08-08 11:14:38 |
|
Does and answers, just not in a measurable scienti | by shminux | 2007-08-08 11:18:29 |
|
If it takes place in the physical world, | by Phoon | 2007-08-08 11:50:04 |
|
Dawkins seems to address many things | by hadji | 2007-08-08 12:18:15 |
|
He could just as easily have phrased it | by Phoon | 2007-08-08 12:37:51 |
|
Neither assumption can be proven correct | by hadji | 2007-08-08 13:00:44 |
|
I can prove that there is little reason to believe | by Phoon | 2007-08-08 13:11:21 |
|
I'm happy for you. | by hadji | 2007-08-08 13:26:42 |
|
I don't understand... | by Nath3 | 2007-08-08 15:21:42 |
|
That's fine. You don't have to understand how. | by hadji | 2007-08-08 20:22:38 |
|
Informative as always. | by tallastro | 2007-08-08 21:29:09 |
|
Look at it this way, and tell me if this | by hadji | 2007-08-08 22:00:59 |
|
I mean no hostility. | by Nath3 | 2007-08-08 21:58:47 |
|
I think what I mean is live and let live. | by hadji | 2007-08-08 22:11:44 |
|
I guess, simply put, you started your comment with | by hadji | 2007-08-08 22:15:37 |
|
He directly addresses that issue in | by Phoon | 2007-08-08 10:56:38 |
|
faith is protected as long as it acknowledges | by shminux | 2007-08-08 11:03:48 |
|
But they're never truly orthogonal. | by Phoon | 2007-08-08 11:12:54 |
|
It's not a scientific question at all, since | by shminux | 2007-08-08 11:28:22 |
|
How is it 'not decidable scientifically'? (n/t) | by Phoon | 2007-08-08 11:31:12 |
|
I'm really sick of people like Dawkins. | by hadji | 2007-08-08 12:28:33 |
|
Feels pretty awful to be looked down on for your | by Phoon | 2007-08-08 12:42:20 |
|
Oh yes, for two wrongs make a right. (n/t) | by krikkert | 2007-08-08 12:48:41 |
|
I've had this view for quite a while regarding | by hadji | 2007-08-08 12:53:33 |
|
I'll back hadji on this. | by Illiad | 2007-08-08 13:08:22 |
|
Okay. I stand corrected. Sorry, hadji. | by Phoon | 2007-08-08 13:21:41 |
|
Science is a great tool. | by hadji | 2007-08-08 13:33:54 |
|
If I have his message right | by Arachnid | 2007-08-08 14:06:59 |
|
I took his meaning to be much the same. | by Phoon | 2007-08-08 14:12:34 |
|
I'm not a fan of Dawkins... | by Illiad | 2007-08-08 14:18:22 |
|
Yes, but that does not mean that religion requires | by hadji | 2007-08-08 14:23:29 |
|
Agreed. | by Illiad | 2007-08-08 14:29:36 |
|
That's a much different meaning than what | by hadji | 2007-08-08 14:18:30 |
|
If that's true, then my memory is inaccurate, or I | by hadji | 2007-08-08 14:16:30 |
|
Well rubbing science in people's faces is his job | by jeff_uk | 2007-08-08 16:34:07 |
|
Except he goes too far. | by hadji | 2007-08-08 22:24:04 |
|
And just to be clear . . . | by hadji | 2007-08-08 22:27:05 |
