|
Thyestean feast in Iraq? | by DesertRat66 | 2007-07-10 07:23:48 |
|
How DARE we ignore all this by | by hadji | 2007-07-10 07:33:05 |
|
Don't get the news much? (n/t) | by DesertRat66 | 2007-07-10 07:34:48 |
|
Don't clarify your points much? (n/t) | by hadji | 2007-07-10 07:36:30 |
|
Nevermind, it's not worth it. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 07:43:01 |
|
I figured you at least skimmed headlines | by DesertRat66 | 2007-07-10 08:25:01 |
|
That post is useless. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 08:36:21 |
|
Am thinking the "absolute silence..." | by esbita | 2007-07-10 09:33:08 |
|
The article says | by jeff_uk | 2007-07-10 09:52:05 |
|
Not that hadji would've known. | by esbita | 2007-07-10 10:02:57 |
|
Yes he could, DR66 quoted that part here..... (n/t) | by jeff_uk | 2007-07-10 10:05:00 |
|
Quoted what, where? (n/t) | by esbita | 2007-07-10 10:09:01 |
|
In the TLP | by hadji | 2007-07-10 10:21:18 |
|
Nice cherry-picking. | by esbita | 2007-07-10 10:32:52 |
|
There are times when cherry-picking is valid. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 11:33:42 |
|
Hardly. Without reading the context... | by esbita | 2007-07-10 12:26:21 |
|
Is there reason to believe that possibly | by Peace_man | 2007-07-10 13:01:15 |
|
Now, that's actually the sorta response I'm lookin | by esbita | 2007-07-10 13:22:49 |
|
What you seem to be missing is that the summary | by hadji | 2007-07-10 13:29:50 |
|
You couldn't have "known" that at the time | by esbita | 2007-07-10 13:41:06 |
|
It was a reasonable guess. And it was right. (n/t | by hadji | 2007-07-10 13:47:51 |
|
But you might not have been right! and arguing | by jeff_uk | 2007-07-10 14:01:35 |
| Kinda like Bush invading Iraq in the first place, |
by hadji |
2007-07-10 14:06:24 |
| huh? Except with him, it still remains to be seen, and even if Iraq does finally stand on its own, it could still be debated whether or not there would have been a better and less costly, less devastating way.
So if I'm an idiot with a personal vendetta for acting on a reasonable guess before I knew I was right, and my actions had no costly consequences . . . that's a pretty good argument against our initial invasion of Iraq, huh?
(Wow, talk about a diversionary tactic!) |
|
[ Reply ] |
