|
Thyestean feast in Iraq? | by DesertRat66 | 2007-07-10 07:23:48 |
|
How DARE we ignore all this by | by hadji | 2007-07-10 07:33:05 |
|
Don't get the news much? (n/t) | by DesertRat66 | 2007-07-10 07:34:48 |
|
Don't clarify your points much? (n/t) | by hadji | 2007-07-10 07:36:30 |
|
Nevermind, it's not worth it. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 07:43:01 |
|
I figured you at least skimmed headlines | by DesertRat66 | 2007-07-10 08:25:01 |
|
That post is useless. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 08:36:21 |
|
Am thinking the "absolute silence..." | by esbita | 2007-07-10 09:33:08 |
|
The article says | by jeff_uk | 2007-07-10 09:52:05 |
|
Not that hadji would've known. | by esbita | 2007-07-10 10:02:57 |
|
Yes he could, DR66 quoted that part here..... (n/t) | by jeff_uk | 2007-07-10 10:05:00 |
|
Quoted what, where? (n/t) | by esbita | 2007-07-10 10:09:01 |
|
In the TLP | by hadji | 2007-07-10 10:21:18 |
|
Nice cherry-picking. | by esbita | 2007-07-10 10:32:52 |
|
There are times when cherry-picking is valid. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 11:33:42 |
|
Hardly. Without reading the context... | by esbita | 2007-07-10 12:26:21 |
|
Evening news has a duty to gather ratings. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 12:31:42 |
|
If a scrap of rhetorical license | by esbita | 2007-07-10 12:41:59 |
|
Chalk it up as you please. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 12:46:41 |
|
And what, pray tell, are you teaching here? | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-10 12:51:54 |
| I've read the articles, and I've seen nothing |
by hadji |
2007-07-10 13:04:26 |
that refutes my points. The second article goes from the point of a single incident to a broad, sweeping generality with no justification. I have, indeed heard several such stories from Western news stories.
So what am I teaching here?
The summary is wrong. DR's agreement with it is wrong. I've read both articles in their entirety, and the claims in the summary are unjustified and falsely generalized from a single incident. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Oh, and I'm constantly hearing that | by hadji | 2007-07-10 13:09:32 |
|
To put it as politely as I can: | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-10 15:04:06 |
|
Ecellent. Thank you. (n/t) | by hadji | 2007-07-10 15:05:31 |
|
*ahem* So now, I've read the article. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 13:43:21 |
|
Others targeted that already. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-10 14:01:08 |
|
I never saw a valid argument against me. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 14:09:27 |
|
See here. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-10 14:17:09 |
|
Your concession is accepted. (n/t) | by hadji | 2007-07-10 14:25:11 |
|
Concession? | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-10 14:40:50 |
|
See here. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 14:44:06 |
|
Ah, the latter part. (n/t) | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-10 14:58:09 |