|
Thyestean feast in Iraq? | by DesertRat66 | 2007-07-10 07:23:48 |
|
How DARE we ignore all this by | by hadji | 2007-07-10 07:33:05 |
|
Don't get the news much? (n/t) | by DesertRat66 | 2007-07-10 07:34:48 |
|
Don't clarify your points much? (n/t) | by hadji | 2007-07-10 07:36:30 |
|
Nevermind, it's not worth it. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 07:43:01 |
|
I figured you at least skimmed headlines | by DesertRat66 | 2007-07-10 08:25:01 |
|
That post is useless. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 08:36:21 |
|
Am thinking the "absolute silence..." | by esbita | 2007-07-10 09:33:08 |
|
The article says | by jeff_uk | 2007-07-10 09:52:05 |
|
Not that hadji would've known. | by esbita | 2007-07-10 10:02:57 |
|
Yes he could, DR66 quoted that part here..... (n/t) | by jeff_uk | 2007-07-10 10:05:00 |
|
Quoted what, where? (n/t) | by esbita | 2007-07-10 10:09:01 |
|
In the TLP | by hadji | 2007-07-10 10:21:18 |
|
Nice cherry-picking. | by esbita | 2007-07-10 10:32:52 |
|
There are times when cherry-picking is valid. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 11:33:42 |
|
Did you apply your skills of scrutiny | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-10 12:23:37 |
|
My agenda is to argue the following points. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 12:39:17 |
|
So, you are after DR66, and not after the article | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-10 12:43:40 |
|
To be more precise, I'm after the TLP. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 12:50:08 |
| You didn't even read the article you criticize. |
by CynicalRyan |
2007-07-10 12:56:48 |
You have no clue in which relation DR66's agreement to the article is in the first place, and criticize it.
This isn't about the TLP. If it were, you'd read the links, especially the one you take issue with. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
I've read both, and I've replied accordingly. (n/t | by hadji | 2007-07-10 13:10:25 |
