|
Thyestean feast in Iraq? | by DesertRat66 | 2007-07-10 07:23:48 |
|
How DARE we ignore all this by | by hadji | 2007-07-10 07:33:05 |
|
Don't get the news much? (n/t) | by DesertRat66 | 2007-07-10 07:34:48 |
|
Don't clarify your points much? (n/t) | by hadji | 2007-07-10 07:36:30 |
|
Nevermind, it's not worth it. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 07:43:01 |
|
I figured you at least skimmed headlines | by DesertRat66 | 2007-07-10 08:25:01 |
|
That post is useless. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 08:36:21 |
|
Am thinking the "absolute silence..." | by esbita | 2007-07-10 09:33:08 |
|
The article says | by jeff_uk | 2007-07-10 09:52:05 |
|
Not that hadji would've known. | by esbita | 2007-07-10 10:02:57 |
|
Yes he could, DR66 quoted that part here..... (n/t) | by jeff_uk | 2007-07-10 10:05:00 |
|
Quoted what, where? (n/t) | by esbita | 2007-07-10 10:09:01 |
|
In the TLP | by hadji | 2007-07-10 10:21:18 |
|
Nice cherry-picking. | by esbita | 2007-07-10 10:32:52 |
|
There are times when cherry-picking is valid. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 11:33:42 |
|
Hardly. Without reading the context... | by esbita | 2007-07-10 12:26:21 |
|
Evening news has a duty to gather ratings. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 12:31:42 |
| If a scrap of rhetorical license |
by esbita |
2007-07-10 12:41:59 |
in an editorial is all you have to cling to, I'm chalking this up to "personal vendetta" unless you can come up with something more substantial, and directly related to the source matrial, and not how it was presented in the TLP (which, by its nature, offered very limited options in how it could be quoted).
I think that if someone picked at every appeal to emotion in articles/editorials about Lebanon that you post, you wouldn't take well to it. And if someone WAS resorting to such cheap tricks on your posts, you'd be right to take it personally. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Chalk it up as you please. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 12:46:41 |
|
And what, pray tell, are you teaching here? | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-10 12:51:54 |
|
I've read the articles, and I've seen nothing | by hadji | 2007-07-10 13:04:26 |
|
Oh, and I'm constantly hearing that | by hadji | 2007-07-10 13:09:32 |
|
To put it as politely as I can: | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-10 15:04:06 |
|
Ecellent. Thank you. (n/t) | by hadji | 2007-07-10 15:05:31 |
|
*ahem* So now, I've read the article. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 13:43:21 |
|
Others targeted that already. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-10 14:01:08 |
|
I never saw a valid argument against me. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 14:09:27 |
|
See here. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-10 14:17:09 |
|
Your concession is accepted. (n/t) | by hadji | 2007-07-10 14:25:11 |
|
Concession? | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-10 14:40:50 |
|
See here. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 14:44:06 |
|
Ah, the latter part. (n/t) | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-10 14:58:09 |
|
And have I mentioned that the scrap of | by hadji | 2007-07-10 13:22:11 |
