|
Thyestean feast in Iraq? | by DesertRat66 | 2007-07-10 07:23:48 |
|
How DARE we ignore all this by | by hadji | 2007-07-10 07:33:05 |
|
Don't get the news much? (n/t) | by DesertRat66 | 2007-07-10 07:34:48 |
|
Don't clarify your points much? (n/t) | by hadji | 2007-07-10 07:36:30 |
|
Nevermind, it's not worth it. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 07:43:01 |
|
I figured you at least skimmed headlines | by DesertRat66 | 2007-07-10 08:25:01 |
|
That post is useless. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 08:36:21 |
|
Am thinking the "absolute silence..." | by esbita | 2007-07-10 09:33:08 |
|
The article says | by jeff_uk | 2007-07-10 09:52:05 |
|
Not that hadji would've known. | by esbita | 2007-07-10 10:02:57 |
|
Yes he could, DR66 quoted that part here..... (n/t) | by jeff_uk | 2007-07-10 10:05:00 |
|
Quoted what, where? (n/t) | by esbita | 2007-07-10 10:09:01 |
| In the TLP |
by hadji |
2007-07-10 10:21:18 |
What is striking about all this savagery—whether with the filmed beheadings of Westerners in Iraq to the recent flaming Johnny Storm human torch at Glasgow, screaming epithets as he sought to engulf bystanders and ignite his canisters . . .
and
the silence of the West toward the primordial horror from Gaza to Anbar is, well, horrific in its own way as well...
Tell me how sweeping statements like that can refer to the specific incident. Tell me how sweeping statements like that do not refer to the multiplicity of incidents which include ones we hear about every day, and ones which we are fighting against every day. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Read the article. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-10 10:31:47 |
|
But the claim of 'absolute silence' was general, | by jeff_uk | 2007-07-10 10:32:52 |
|
It puts the quotes into the approproate | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-10 10:36:41 |
|
Nice cherry-picking. | by esbita | 2007-07-10 10:32:52 |
|
There are times when cherry-picking is valid. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 11:33:42 |
|
Did you apply your skills of scrutiny | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-10 12:23:37 |
|
My agenda is to argue the following points. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 12:39:17 |
|
So, you are after DR66, and not after the article | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-10 12:43:40 |
|
To be more precise, I'm after the TLP. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 12:50:08 |
|
You didn't even read the article you criticize. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-10 12:56:48 |
|
I've read both, and I've replied accordingly. (n/t | by hadji | 2007-07-10 13:10:25 |
|
Hardly. Without reading the context... | by esbita | 2007-07-10 12:26:21 |
|
Evening news has a duty to gather ratings. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 12:31:42 |
|
Will you read the article? | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-10 12:35:00 |
|
If a scrap of rhetorical license | by esbita | 2007-07-10 12:41:59 |
|
Chalk it up as you please. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 12:46:41 |
|
And what, pray tell, are you teaching here? | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-10 12:51:54 |
|
I've read the articles, and I've seen nothing | by hadji | 2007-07-10 13:04:26 |
|
Oh, and I'm constantly hearing that | by hadji | 2007-07-10 13:09:32 |
|
To put it as politely as I can: | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-10 15:04:06 |
|
Ecellent. Thank you. (n/t) | by hadji | 2007-07-10 15:05:31 |
|
*ahem* So now, I've read the article. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 13:43:21 |
|
Others targeted that already. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-10 14:01:08 |
|
I never saw a valid argument against me. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 14:09:27 |
|
See here. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-10 14:17:09 |
|
Your concession is accepted. (n/t) | by hadji | 2007-07-10 14:25:11 |
|
Concession? | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-10 14:40:50 |
|
See here. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 14:44:06 |
|
Ah, the latter part. (n/t) | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-10 14:58:09 |
|
And have I mentioned that the scrap of | by hadji | 2007-07-10 13:22:11 |
|
Is there reason to believe that possibly | by Peace_man | 2007-07-10 13:01:15 |
|
If you look back a few days | by DesertRat66 | 2007-07-10 13:09:32 |
|
And in the article states that someone | by Peace_man | 2007-07-10 13:15:02 |
|
More the general | by DesertRat66 | 2007-07-10 13:25:45 |
|
I hear quite a bit about the atrocities | by hadji | 2007-07-10 13:32:24 |
|
Where from | by DesertRat66 | 2007-07-10 13:38:22 |
|
Various sources, but primarily NPR. | by hadji | 2007-07-10 13:58:29 |
|
You make a perfect counter example | by DesertRat66 | 2007-07-10 14:17:07 |
|
I would not dispute the claim of | by hadji | 2007-07-10 14:23:29 |
|
It is also no new revelation that mainstream | by hadji | 2007-07-10 14:32:56 |
|
It's also not a new one that | by DesertRat66 | 2007-07-10 14:50:51 |
|
"While there may not be 'Absolute Silence' . . ." | by hadji | 2007-07-10 14:54:46 |
|
You seem to have an unhealthy fascination | by Peace_man | 2007-07-10 13:54:32 |
|
Having seen what extremists can do up close and | by DesertRat66 | 2007-07-10 14:03:33 |
|
Now, that's actually the sorta response I'm lookin | by esbita | 2007-07-10 13:22:49 |
|
What you seem to be missing is that the summary | by hadji | 2007-07-10 13:29:50 |
|
You couldn't have "known" that at the time | by esbita | 2007-07-10 13:41:06 |
|
It was a reasonable guess. And it was right. (n/t | by hadji | 2007-07-10 13:47:51 |
|
But you might not have been right! and arguing | by jeff_uk | 2007-07-10 14:01:35 |
|
Kinda like Bush invading Iraq in the first place, | by hadji | 2007-07-10 14:06:24 |