|
Guys - be gentle on the board | by Myke | 2007-07-09 14:27:48 |
|
Hardware failure, then? | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-09 14:30:12 |
|
Or even VMWare Server and a SAN (n/t) | by theanomaly | 2007-07-09 14:33:51 |
|
Ah, not so good. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-09 14:37:29 |
|
True enough - the general direction of the suggest | by theanomaly | 2007-07-09 14:41:10 |
|
Paravirtualisation. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-09 14:42:15 |
|
I'm getting my first exposure to ESX in a producti | by theanomaly | 2007-07-09 14:44:17 |
|
Xen. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-09 14:53:01 |
|
I've heard that Virtual PC is < VMware equivalents | by theanomaly | 2007-07-09 14:55:57 |
|
Well, I haven't noticed anything big | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-09 15:00:16 |
|
have virtualbox running here myself | by Freakazoid | 2007-07-09 15:14:10 |
|
Both seem to be rather feature complete. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-09 15:18:13 |
|
virtualbox's snapshot support seems to be better | by Freakazoid | 2007-07-09 15:24:58 |
|
I've had more than one snapshot with VMware | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-09 15:31:37 |
|
"better than anything I've seen" riiight | by Freakazoid | 2007-07-09 16:00:26 |
|
huh, neat. There's a interesting feature or two | by Freakazoid | 2007-07-09 16:06:30 |
| Compare apples and oranges. |
by CynicalRyan |
2007-07-09 16:25:38 |
Firstly, as I've said, better than anything I've seen. Logic clearly says that I cannot comment on anything I didn't see. My only experience with the VirtualBox tools was a completely shot Ubuntu VM. Didn't try after that, since I usually don't need the tools anyway.
Furthermore, you are comparing VMware Server, which is only available in one edition, to the closed-source semi-commercial package of another software. At least keep your comparisons straight.
And never mind that VMware Server comes with a web-based management interface, and allows to launch VMs in different user contexts, even at log on of a user. Something, VirtualBox cannot do.
Use the right tool for the right purpose. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
you forget: this isn't going to be for a server | by Freakazoid | 2007-07-09 16:32:30 |
|
Exactly. Different options. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-09 16:39:07 |