|
Guys - be gentle on the board | by Myke | 2007-07-09 14:27:48 |
| Hardware failure, then? |
by CynicalRyan |
2007-07-09 14:30:12 |
| Time to look deeper into Xen, then, I guess.. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Or even VMWare Server and a SAN (n/t) | by theanomaly | 2007-07-09 14:33:51 |
|
Ah, not so good. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-09 14:37:29 |
|
True enough - the general direction of the suggest | by theanomaly | 2007-07-09 14:41:10 |
|
Paravirtualisation. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-09 14:42:15 |
|
I'm getting my first exposure to ESX in a producti | by theanomaly | 2007-07-09 14:44:17 |
|
Xen. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-09 14:53:01 |
|
I've heard that Virtual PC is < VMware equivalents | by theanomaly | 2007-07-09 14:55:57 |
|
Well, I haven't noticed anything big | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-09 15:00:16 |
|
Duly noted. I'll keep in mind that you | by theanomaly | 2007-07-09 15:03:37 |
|
If you can live with an honest | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-09 15:06:51 |
|
have virtualbox running here myself | by Freakazoid | 2007-07-09 15:14:10 |
|
Both seem to be rather feature complete. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-09 15:18:13 |
|
virtualbox's snapshot support seems to be better | by Freakazoid | 2007-07-09 15:24:58 |
|
I've had more than one snapshot with VMware | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-09 15:31:37 |
|
"better than anything I've seen" riiight | by Freakazoid | 2007-07-09 16:00:26 |
|
huh, neat. There's a interesting feature or two | by Freakazoid | 2007-07-09 16:06:30 |
|
Compare apples and oranges. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-09 16:25:38 |
|
you forget: this isn't going to be for a server | by Freakazoid | 2007-07-09 16:32:30 |
|
Exactly. Different options. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-09 16:39:07 |
|
So rude! (n/t) | by Myke | 2007-07-09 16:34:36 |
|
I believe the 1-snapshot deal is profit-motivated | by Myke | 2007-07-09 16:34:04 |
|
Well, offering the whole stuff for free | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-09 16:40:19 |
|
zSeries? | by pverdon | 2007-07-09 15:10:08 |
|
That's big iron. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-09 15:33:46 |
|
That "IBM hardware from the 60s" | by pverdon | 2007-07-09 16:49:09 |
|
Yes, that dawned upon me after a while. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-09 17:47:14 |
|
With VT in the CPUs now tho, | by Myke | 2007-07-09 15:21:12 |
|
Depends. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-09 15:25:54 |
|
Although VMware Converter is free (n/t) | by theanomaly | 2007-07-09 15:27:32 |
|
converter != migration tool | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-09 15:32:47 |
|
Also does physical to VM, but only if source = Win | by theanomaly | 2007-07-09 15:36:35 |
|
Ah, that's new, then. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-09 15:41:43 |
|
Debatable for UF and Svrni. | by Arachnid | 2007-07-09 15:17:47 |
|
Wellllllllll | by Myke | 2007-07-09 15:19:46 |
|
Not quite. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-09 15:21:55 |
|
It only offers failover if you have something to | by Arachnid | 2007-07-09 15:24:10 |
|
You have the infrastructure, though, | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-09 15:28:14 |
