The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

How taxes work. by subbywan2007-07-03 16:24:23
  Which is fine if it's tax cuts for everyone... by Arachnid2007-07-03 16:45:56
    Not the ones I've seen ... by subbywan2007-07-03 16:51:23
      I've never seen that by Arachnid2007-07-03 16:56:07
        The biggest yes. Hence this analogy by subbywan2007-07-03 17:02:34
          No, I said the biggest _percentile_ cut. by Arachnid2007-07-03 17:03:39
            can think of 2 things for that: by subbywan2007-07-03 17:06:33
              Depends on your country. by Arachnid2007-07-03 17:08:06
                Yes, but we assume we're talking about the US :P by subbywan2007-07-03 17:17:08
                  Ha! by Arachnid2007-07-03 17:19:07
                    Yes, but the accountant is often only fhe by subbywan2007-07-03 17:21:54
                      You can still hire people to do that for you by Arachnid2007-07-03 17:25:46
                        "cost-effective" includes opportunity cost. by esbita2007-07-03 18:08:34
                          As long as those tax writeoffs are still there by Arachnid2007-07-03 19:03:56
                            Yes it would... by esbita 2007-07-03 19:34:48
...if you can find a better "legitimate" use for the money rather than pursuing the tax break, or even participating in the black market. I could avoid further taxation on my investment returns by buying gold/silver bullion, and selling later in small trickles for cash, unreported. Returns on precious metals usually aren't that much though. But it'd be rather hard for the government to find out my profit. Besides, long term capital gains taxes aren't that high, so it makes better sense for me to toss my investment budget in mutual funds.

But if the capital gains taxes got high enough, you bet your a3 I'd be going the gold bullion route, or other investments, or other evasion methods.

I could also take on a second job, but only if what I net is worth the trouble. You'll note that there's often a different hourly rate quoted for "under the table" vs. "on the books" in many occupations. The likelihood of someone working "under the table" increases as taxation increases. If the tax rate is "reasonable," a worker may not consider it worth the risk to evade. The higher the rate, the more it's worth taking the risk. The government can charge a lower rate, and have more people in compliance, or a higher rate, and fewer people actually paying it.
[ Reply ]
                              None of that applies. by Arachnid2007-07-03 20:05:14
                                We're not arguing effectiveness by subbywan2007-07-03 20:07:08

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)