|
Anybody here open to Tarot cards? | by EnzoMatrix | 2007-07-03 01:29:06 |
|
What force is supposed to act upon the cards? | by jeff_uk | 2007-07-03 01:37:36 |
|
Self interpretation. | by EnzoMatrix | 2007-07-03 02:05:38 |
|
So they're just dead organic matter? | by jeff_uk | 2007-07-03 02:11:40 |
|
And yet still... | by EnzoMatrix | 2007-07-03 02:38:30 |
|
For Enzo: a non-secular perspective | by zeitnot | 2007-07-03 04:10:57 |
|
IMO the definition of god | by EnzoMatrix | 2007-07-03 04:57:11 |
|
here's why. [again, non-secular perspective] | by zeitnot | 2007-07-03 05:08:17 |
|
He threw Adam and Eve out of Paradise. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-03 05:21:12 |
|
Ten plagues, each one after the pharaoh refused to | by toysbfun | 2007-07-03 05:27:41 |
|
Justified homicide and genocide, then. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-03 05:38:34 |
|
It's "Thou shalt not murder". | by toysbfun | 2007-07-03 05:55:16 |
|
If I were God, I'd have snapped my fingers | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-03 06:10:32 |
|
This gets into some pretty heavy concepts on | by esbita | 2007-07-03 06:25:21 |
|
Teh concept of free will is lead ad absurdum | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-03 06:33:02 |
|
Pharaoh and his officials... | by esbita | 2007-07-03 06:56:16 |
|
Yes, but you can safely assume | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-03 07:09:10 |
|
You're making the mistake... | by esbita | 2007-07-03 07:36:33 |
| If free will should have any worth: |
by CynicalRyan |
2007-07-03 07:43:15 |
Yes, they should have. If for no other reason, because God wants to demonstrate that the individual matters, and not the mass of people. That the individual's decisions are important (of course, he demonstrated this with the killing of the first born, but in a way that wasn't productive, IMO).
Besides, the welfare of the Egyptian people relied on the priest caste, and their predictions of the Nile flood. Military wasn't as important in those times as we like to think (usually a conscript or mercenary army raised in wartimes, not the standing armies we have today, apart from a ruler's bodyguard). |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Again, judge by the standards of the time. | by esbita | 2007-07-03 07:58:02 |
|
but the absence of individual rights and | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-03 08:13:04 |
|
But that would have prevented | by MatthewDBA | 2007-07-03 08:16:36 |
|
Why? (n/t) | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-03 08:21:19 |
|
You can't have moral responsibility... | by esbita | 2007-07-03 08:26:08 |
|
I see. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-03 08:36:39 |
|
The others were only temporary. | by esbita | 2007-07-03 08:46:25 |
|
It's probably the concept of "fear me, | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-03 08:56:23 |
|
Would you feel less uneasy | by MatthewDBA | 2007-07-03 09:08:40 |
|
Yes. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-03 09:37:57 |
|
start | by MatthewDBA | 2007-07-03 09:51:13 |
|
Great! Thanks. :D (n/t) | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-03 10:02:59 |