|
Anybody here open to Tarot cards? | by EnzoMatrix | 2007-07-03 01:29:06 |
|
What force is supposed to act upon the cards? | by jeff_uk | 2007-07-03 01:37:36 |
|
Self interpretation. | by EnzoMatrix | 2007-07-03 02:05:38 |
|
So they're just dead organic matter? | by jeff_uk | 2007-07-03 02:11:40 |
|
And yet still... | by EnzoMatrix | 2007-07-03 02:38:30 |
|
For Enzo: a non-secular perspective | by zeitnot | 2007-07-03 04:10:57 |
|
IMO the definition of god | by EnzoMatrix | 2007-07-03 04:57:11 |
|
here's why. [again, non-secular perspective] | by zeitnot | 2007-07-03 05:08:17 |
|
He threw Adam and Eve out of Paradise. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-03 05:21:12 |
|
Ten plagues, each one after the pharaoh refused to | by toysbfun | 2007-07-03 05:27:41 |
|
Justified homicide and genocide, then. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-03 05:38:34 |
|
It's "Thou shalt not murder". | by toysbfun | 2007-07-03 05:55:16 |
|
If I were God, I'd have snapped my fingers | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-03 06:10:32 |
|
With regard to your first sentence *only* | by MatthewDBA | 2007-07-03 06:21:47 |
|
Who says I have to allow choice when I'm a god? (n (n/t) | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-03 06:44:01 |
|
If you're a god | by MatthewDBA | 2007-07-03 07:05:30 |
| All-loving isn't usually attributed to a god. |
by CynicalRyan |
2007-07-03 07:14:01 |
| Omniscience, omnipresence, and omnipotence, on the other hand, are. And who says that I have to allow choice? I'm omnipotent in this scenario. I can do what I want, for the reasons I want. I answer to no one. And I don't need to give my followers any rules for behavior, either, nor grant them free will (who says that my followers are capable of choice?). |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
All-loving | by MatthewDBA | 2007-07-03 07:32:51 |
|
Alas, this incarantion of God is not all-loving. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-03 07:37:49 |
