|
Anybody here open to Tarot cards? | by EnzoMatrix | 2007-07-03 01:29:06 |
|
What force is supposed to act upon the cards? | by jeff_uk | 2007-07-03 01:37:36 |
|
Self interpretation. | by EnzoMatrix | 2007-07-03 02:05:38 |
|
So they're just dead organic matter? | by jeff_uk | 2007-07-03 02:11:40 |
|
And yet still... | by EnzoMatrix | 2007-07-03 02:38:30 |
|
For Enzo: a non-secular perspective | by zeitnot | 2007-07-03 04:10:57 |
|
IMO the definition of god | by EnzoMatrix | 2007-07-03 04:57:11 |
|
here's why. [again, non-secular perspective] | by zeitnot | 2007-07-03 05:08:17 |
|
He threw Adam and Eve out of Paradise. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-03 05:21:12 |
|
You're interpreting a metaphor literally | by MatthewDBA | 2007-07-03 05:35:22 |
|
God is omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-03 05:40:38 |
| Again you're using the word "would" |
by MatthewDBA |
2007-07-03 06:04:42 |
| You appear to me to be implying that God foresaw the event; that is, that he distinguished between the point of "knowing the event would happen" and the point of the event happening (as we generally do when we foresee things). What I'm saying is that as I conceive of God, he makes no such distinction. Instead of foreseeing the event, God experienced the results of the free will he gave to Adam and Eve. It was their decision, and he allowed them to make it, and to suffer the consequences. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
So, I'm using the word "would". | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-03 06:20:38 |
|
If he knows it as it's happening | by MatthewDBA | 2007-07-03 06:30:08 |
|
The German saying would equivalent | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-03 06:39:31 |
|
Offcourse we DO realise | by EnzoMatrix | 2007-07-03 06:49:13 |
|
Written and passed on by man, right | by MatthewDBA | 2007-07-03 06:59:56 |
|
And are probably quite distorted in the Old | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-03 07:06:28 |
|
Quite possibly | by MatthewDBA | 2007-07-03 07:10:36 |
|
That, we do. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-03 07:14:58 |
|
The fact that there is a god maybe... | by EnzoMatrix | 2007-07-03 07:25:13 |
|
Yes, there can. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-03 07:30:12 |
|
Now I see | by MatthewDBA | 2007-07-03 06:50:58 |
|
Not a word, but a saying. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-03 07:05:16 |
|
Again, my interpretation would not | by MatthewDBA | 2007-07-03 07:09:40 |
|
No, I didn't refer to God as all-loving. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-03 07:18:56 |
|
God *wants* people to act | by MatthewDBA | 2007-07-03 07:38:20 |
|
Yes, you made this clear. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-03 07:51:39 |
|
A few nitpicks | by MatthewDBA | 2007-07-03 08:14:41 |
|
A few clarifications: | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-03 08:28:18 |
|
That's a really good question | by MatthewDBA | 2007-07-03 09:07:50 |
|
RE language: Yes, it does. | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-03 09:35:18 |
|
You *really really* | by MatthewDBA | 2007-07-03 09:49:24 |
|
*notes down books* | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-03 10:01:23 |
|
If you're "not in that habit" | by MatthewDBA | 2007-07-03 10:08:08 |
|
Well, I'm too fond of certain pleasures | by CynicalRyan | 2007-07-03 10:10:39 |
|
*dares CynicalRyan* | by esbita | 2007-07-03 10:17:07 |