The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Field report of JimK's pancake recipe. (With minor by Esteis 2007-06-12 10:44:23
modifications.) The recipe, if you will recall, is equal volumes of egg, milk, and flour.

I just cooked myself a pancake dinner, and I used JimK's recipe. I worked with two eggs. I rocked the flour when measuring it, allowing it to pack. Um, I just noticed that I should have used self-raising flour, so you might want to take this review with a grain of salt. Speaking of which, I also added salt to the mix.

Anyhow, I think the batter was far too dense. It didn't spread out very well, the pancakes didn't roll up well, and one beautifully thin one even broke when I rolled it. Also, there weren't very many pancakes — 4 in total, just enough for one meal. Unless I have very small huevos, that's a sign the batter needs more milk — I normally get about 8 - 12 pancakes from that amount of batter.

Next time, I think I'll use about twice as much milk, unless I'm making special pancakes: the advantage of the thick batter is that they rest on your spatula, rather than folding over them. This means that you can flip apple or bacon pancakes without having them break around the inserted slabs. For that kind of pancake, these proportions are ideal.

I'm used to adding the oil/butter to the batter in advance, instead of oiling/buttering the pan, so I added about a third volume of oil to the batter. That worked well.

The pancakes cooked to goldish very quickly, which was nice. The batter was very quick to make, which was also nice. This recipe makes for very stiff pancakes, ideal for pancakes with large inserts; if you prefer to bake them natural, (or with small inserts, like raisins or cheese,) then I'd recommend using about twice as much milk.

All in all, a very useful recipe basis, especially by virtue of being easy to remember. Needs a lot more milk, though.
[ Reply ]
  It's nonsense. by Didactylos2007-06-12 10:48:15
    I don't really mind that margin of error. by Esteis2007-06-12 11:02:59
    I'd suggest sifting the flour in by esbita2007-06-12 11:12:01
      If gluten development is an issue by Didactylos2007-06-12 11:26:28
        There are certainly differences. by esbita2007-06-12 11:44:29
      I did a poor man's sifting: tapping in a little by Esteis2007-06-12 11:37:36
    Who said anything about accuracy? by JimK2007-06-12 12:37:25
      Experiment? Be creative? Surely you jest! (n/t) by esbita2007-06-12 12:52:10
  Hm... could be because of different definitions by vectorz2007-06-12 11:17:29
    D'oh! Yes, that's very, very, likely. (n/t) by Esteis2007-06-12 11:39:53
    Sometimes I make them with buckwheat flour, too. by JimK2007-06-12 12:41:47
  The one from the UF cookbook by FNORDer2007-06-12 11:37:10
    I'll try that one, too, then. by Esteis2007-06-12 11:41:45
      It's a thick batter and takes ages to pour. by FNORDer2007-06-12 11:58:10
      Thick-ish, size determined by pan size IMO by purplepineapple2007-06-12 17:41:35
  The one we use for breakfast is simple. by da-gimp2007-06-12 12:10:22
    That's my great-aunt's recipe. by spud312007-06-12 12:25:04

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)