The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Engfeh! I'm too complex for my own sake? by kyrasantae 2007-05-18 12:01:45
Being a semi-pacifist who condemns the use of (and very much also the existence of) firearms, it makes it impossible for me to play shooter games (whether FPS or not) (aversion to firearms), as well as other first-person (fantasy) action games (aversion to being the agent committing the act of violence)... I need my distance... and for some reason it's difficult to explain this.

Hmm.
[ Reply ]
  The perfect game for you. Pong. by therantinggeek2007-05-18 12:06:49
    I was thinking Sim City by VivianC2007-05-18 12:22:49
      But the police have guns! *flees* (n/t) by CynicalRyan2007-05-18 12:27:07
        And you can demolish people's homes! (n/t) by esbita2007-05-18 12:37:03
          Well, Transport Tycoon Deluxe is out of the by CynicalRyan2007-05-18 12:38:58
      But you can shoot that annoying traffic chopper! ( (n/t) by shminux2007-05-18 13:10:45
  You're kidding, right? by hactar the uhhh2007-05-18 12:29:34
    No, she's not. (n/t) by VivianC2007-05-18 12:41:36
    Hey - I play Guild Wars by kyrasantae2007-05-18 12:53:12
  You could use my excuse by voxwoman2007-05-18 12:41:47
    Thing is, I *like* fantasy action/RPG games by kyrasantae2007-05-18 12:50:00
      so do I by voxwoman2007-05-18 12:53:12
  Oh and Threadjack by voxwoman2007-05-18 12:42:28
  You are going to have a very hard time by Havoc2007-05-18 12:49:12
    It doesn't sound like violence gets to her by MatthewDBA2007-05-18 12:51:19
      Exactly so. by kyrasantae2007-05-18 12:52:15
        Ahhh. OK. (n/t) by Havoc2007-05-18 12:52:46
    Oh no, I'm fine with violence in the news by kyrasantae2007-05-18 12:51:24
      Seriously, though... by therantinggeek2007-05-18 12:52:32
        Dude, if she only HELD a sword, by Havoc2007-05-18 12:53:34
        You don't need a weapon to defend yourself. by CynicalRyan2007-05-18 12:54:01
          I never practiced martial arts for the skills by kyrasantae2007-05-18 12:57:12
            Intended as a means to inflict violence on by CynicalRyan2007-05-18 12:58:10
              For me it's all a dance by kyrasantae2007-05-18 13:01:50
                Tai Chi is the epitom of martial arts. by CynicalRyan2007-05-18 13:04:04
                  eh, epitome. (n/t) by CynicalRyan2007-05-18 13:05:25
                  Aikido. Less Internal More external. (n/t) by joecrouse2007-05-18 13:06:21
                  and it's also used to balance by voxwoman2007-05-18 13:32:54
                    No, but the balance of energy is part by CynicalRyan2007-05-18 13:36:12
                      I'm comparing the external...visual image of it by kyrasantae2007-05-18 17:04:12
          BWAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! by DesertRat662007-05-18 12:59:40
            How well trained is the typical robber? (n/t) by raptor_872007-05-18 13:02:07
              Not to forget preoccupied.. (n/t) by CynicalRyan2007-05-18 13:03:18
              That would depend by DesertRat662007-05-18 13:53:32
                And aim for the dangly bits. (n/t) by CynicalRyan2007-05-18 13:57:53
            I dunno depending on how close I can get by joecrouse2007-05-18 13:03:15
              You or TK could put a round or ten through me by joecrouse2007-05-18 13:05:31
              That's why I said untrained by DesertRat662007-05-18 13:13:19
                Aikido, Gungfu, Karate by joecrouse2007-05-18 13:16:11
                  Gunfu? *snerk* (n/t) by voxwoman2007-05-18 13:29:43
                    gun kata? (n/t) by raptor_872007-05-18 13:31:05
                      How do you disarm a Tetragrammaton Cleric? by CynicalRyan2007-05-18 13:34:35
                    AKA the martial art of... by DesertRat662007-05-18 13:48:10
                    Gung Fu is the PROPER spelling by joecrouse2007-05-18 13:57:36
                      The proper spelling would be the Chinese by CynicalRyan2007-05-18 13:59:07
                        PHHHPPPPPPPPPPTTTTTTTTTTT (n/t) by joecrouse2007-05-18 14:03:22
        I would rather die than stoop to that level by kyrasantae2007-05-18 12:55:48
          Not to be morbid... by esbita2007-05-18 12:58:45
            If you have two ideals by MatthewDBA2007-05-18 13:01:17
              Except you might save yourself from enduring one. by esbita2007-05-18 13:05:44
                ever see Erik the Viking? by voxwoman2007-05-18 13:28:47
                  That was an...interesting scene. (n/t) by esbita2007-05-18 13:30:15
                if "lucky" by MatthewDBA2007-05-18 17:25:14
                  Ideals? Bah. It's called being squamish. by esbita2007-05-18 20:00:41
          That strikes me as wrong. by VivianC2007-05-18 13:02:27
            *doesn't know whether to laugh* by kyrasantae2007-05-18 13:03:17
              You say that *now* by therantinggeek2007-05-18 13:13:35
                Not every woman is the same... by Nea2007-05-18 16:49:21
                  Forget children... by kyrasantae2007-05-18 17:03:05
              That's a new one on me. by VivianC2007-05-18 13:13:48
            Why? by MatthewDBA2007-05-18 13:04:00
        If it was just me, I'd probably run by MatthewDBA2007-05-18 12:57:17
          That is a sane reaction, IMO. by CynicalRyan2007-05-18 13:07:27
          I can understand that by esbita2007-05-18 13:10:18
          I take the opposite view. by therantinggeek2007-05-18 13:27:24
      What about any other weapon? (n/t) by esbita2007-05-18 12:52:36
      *peer pressure* by VivianC2007-05-18 12:55:39
  Going to a conference...back in the evening (n/t) by kyrasantae2007-05-18 12:57:35
  Taken in by Rona Jaffe's "Mazes and Monsters"? (n/t) by kahuana2007-05-18 13:13:25

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)