The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Next time, shall we NOT offer help to the US? by klaranth2007-04-30 02:30:56
  This is why I dont trust the government. by esbita2007-04-30 06:06:21
    Why do you think that might be? by Peace_man2007-04-30 08:57:07
      See lab rat's reply for a dose of reality. by esbita2007-04-30 09:58:03
        I certainly don't disagree with what you're saying by Peace_man2007-04-30 12:47:26
          Agreed on the last- somewhat. by esbita2007-04-30 14:00:19
            You're right - the outcome is far from what by Peace_man2007-04-30 14:19:00
              There are already the "welfare programs" in place. by esbita 2007-04-30 15:14:47
Master plumbers and master electricians are not so quickly or easily trained. Your point can be made for basic labor, but not SKILLED trades. NOLA already has "training" programs set up for unskilled folk to get their start in the trades.

Welfare programs are run by the states at the grassroots level. The current laws and benefit structure does NOT require/mandate someone to take a job out of the area, and for good reason. Do you WANT some bureaucrat saying "here's a carpet-laying position 2000 miles away that pays $8/hr, here's your bus ticket; take the job or lose benefits?" Gotta draw the line somewhere. So no, the government does NOT furnish bus tickets out of town. Too easy to foist your "undesirables" on another state that way.

Skilled contractors nationwide usually have plenty of work available for them locally- with wages depressed a bit by immigrant labor (some legal, much of it illegal- workers compensation coverage is EXPENSIVE for carpenters). The problem NATIONWIDE isn't the lack of work available, but the relatively low pay for hard, dirty work. Few legal folk want to do it, because the compensation sucks. Why in God's name would a contractor go 1500 miles away to make "going rate" in NOLA when he can get the "going rate" locally?

It makes as much sense as me getting a job that pays the same salary in Chicago, where taxes are higher and rent is twice as much. Can't make me. To pursuade me, it'd have to be for a higher salary.

You also forget that a truly free market can re-balance itself. If the wages are high enough, you have a lot more people willing to come to NOLA. With enough workers meeting demand, the wages will eventually settle down to pre-hurricane levels. Meanwhile, the destruction zone gets rebuilt FASTER.

And, you still have a choice under this situation. Is waiting to rebuild because you can't afford a contractor any BETTER than waiting to rebuild because a contractor isn't available at all? I bet the former would resolve itself much quicker than the latter. Under the capitalist model, the area will be rebuilt more quickly, freeing up the labor later on to work for cheaper as conditions improve. Under the price control model, any children I may have will be entering college before the city's totally rebuilt.
[ Reply ]
                I'm getting confused, here. by Peace_man2007-04-30 15:54:34
                  Yes that is the case! by esbita2007-04-30 16:49:38
                    Thanks for those links. Very informative. by Peace_man2007-04-30 17:19:42
                      One man's "premium" is another man's "gouging." by esbita2007-04-30 17:54:00

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)