UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

About car efficiency... (and re: Skippy and Tyop)	by etwas_egal	2007-04-30 00:07:38
Consolidate errands	by shadowboy813	2007-04-30 06:06:51
*Refinement to point 6: accelerate* slower.**	by etwas_egal	2007-04-30 07:46:13
Empirically, I used to use over half my fuel in the first 100m after full stops. Urban driving exaggerates this. Consolidating errands can also be refined to "consolidate errands along highways", which just happens to work in my life. Point one: why should I rev that high before shifting? Wait, that's point 8... "Brake Specific Fuel Consumption"? Is that visible to the driver in some way? Wait... you say rev's do matter to city driving. And that's what I do. Except when I'm on the highway, and that's the only time the car regularly sees 2500+. Point seven: I have no A/C! This is living cheap, not saving the world!
[ Reply ]
No, I meant DRIVE slower for point 6	by shadowboy813	2007-04-30 10:12:30
Highway speed limits here are at your break point	by etwas_egal	2007-04-30 11:34:10
Any clustering I'm currently doing...	by shadowboy813	2007-04-30 14:20:21
I figured you would be doing something like that	by etwas_egal	2007-04-30 14:54:51
Well, as you can imagine, my matrices are dense	by shadowboy813	2007-04-30 16:55:25

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)