UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Invoke( Mail_Admins );	by firehawk	2007-04-26 09:10:03
See	by SoylentGreen	2007-04-26 09:29:22
I wouldn't trust the spamcop numbers (n/t)	by rfrovarp	2007-04-26 10:20:20
Why not? (n/t)	by firehawk	2007-04-26 12:03:06
Spamcop, historically, has been inaccurate	by SoylentGreen	2007-04-26 12:33:24
But these numbers aren't FROM SpamCop...	by firehawk	2007-04-26 12:49:48
Of course I did, especially the last paragraph	by SoylentGreen	2007-04-26 13:03:57
What the numbers (and article) are claiming is that spamcop's blacklist is very reliable and has low false positives. This runs counter to past experience (Al Iverson's, mine, and rfrovarp's) that spamcop is less-than-fully reliable, because of the way that their blocklist used to be fed directly from end-luser-submitted reports. I was explaining why spamcop's blocklist has a better reliability and a lower false positive percentage than expected -- because they changed the way that their blocklist was being fed.
[ Reply ]
Yep	by rfrovarp	2007-04-26 14:44:31
Gotcha.	by firehawk	2007-04-26 21:42:54

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)