|
Court: Scout Jamboree May Receive Federal Help | by DesertRat66 | 2007-04-06 10:49:19 |
| I agree with the ruling, but... |
by Kickstart |
2007-04-06 11:07:17 |
...they really need to get rid of that "believe in God" requirement. To me, that seems well outside the whole reason for the Scouts' existence. They weren't set up to be an exclusionary club.
KS |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
AFAIK, that was a requirement Baden-Powell | by subbywan | 2007-04-06 11:10:48 |
|
Baden-Powell wasn't infallible. (n/t) | by Phoon | 2007-04-06 11:34:55 |
|
yes, but that's not the dispute. | by subbywan | 2007-04-06 11:38:12 |
|
BSA is a non-profit organization | by drmoats | 2007-04-06 12:08:30 |
|
I wasn't ever a member of BSA, but I was a | by subbywan | 2007-04-06 12:10:15 |
|
Trustworthy like accepting | by hyzenthlay | 2007-04-06 12:26:41 |
|
What public funds have they accepted | by subbywan | 2007-04-06 12:33:20 |
|
Not incorrectly per-see, but deceptivly | by hyzenthlay | 2007-04-06 13:42:48 |
|
But they *haven't* been offered funds. | by subbywan | 2007-04-06 14:16:23 |
|
Yes I am saying they should not have accepted | by hyzenthlay | 2007-04-06 17:16:56 |
|
They became a privately funded | by joecrouse | 2007-04-06 12:38:06 |
|
And I would day, that since you are making the cla (n/t) | by drmoats | 2007-04-06 12:54:59 |
|
HUH? (n/t) | by joecrouse | 2007-04-06 12:59:29 |
|
Yeah Joe! Try to answer that! | by VivianC | 2007-04-06 13:40:23 |
|
If you are asking me to support my argument | by hyzenthlay | 2007-04-06 13:47:46 |
|
Therefore, you should not misrepresent | by drmoats | 2007-04-06 16:16:58 |
|
Excuse me? | by hyzenthlay | 2007-04-06 17:12:43 |
|
Baden-Powell was also, according to some, gay | by SoylentGreen | 2007-04-06 12:34:13 |
|
Good example of the damage that sexual repression | by ixeian | 2007-04-06 14:00:09 |
|
They also need to get rid of the no gays policy (n (n/t) | by SoylentGreen | 2007-04-06 11:11:08 |
|
Agreed. | by jdelphiki | 2007-04-06 12:00:52 |
