The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Question of the Day! by kickstart2007-03-05 00:00:04
  we used to have turbo switches on computers by buzzin2007-03-05 00:59:25
    Assuming you meant 486 SX/DX: by bwkaz2007-03-05 04:08:04
      no...386 :) by buzzin2007-03-05 06:47:01
        There was no "DX coprocessor" for the 386. by bwkaz 2007-03-05 19:16:16
The only "coprocessor" was the math coprocessor, and *ALL* 386 chips could have one of those added. You did *not* upgrade an SX to a DX by adding one. The difference between SX and DX was the number of address lines, and you can't change that by adding an extra chip.

Now, the 486SX chip had no math coprocessor, and all 486DXes did (though as you point out, there were several clock multipliers). And the "math coprocessor" for the 486SX was really just a 486DX, which disabled the main chip. That was the only SX -> DX upgrade that you could *do*, let alone that involved a coprocessor.

(I should know on the 386 chips: I had a 386DX-33 that got a math coprocessor added about a year later. It was *never* an SX.)
[ Reply ]

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)