UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Ordnance-Corner for UFies	by Ordnance_Corner	2007-02-16 10:09:25
Hey, new cover page. And new intent to kill.	by Peace_man	2007-02-16 10:17:53
That is the designed purpose of guns, after all. ( (n/t)	by JimK	2007-02-16 10:25:18
Good in theory...	by ayteebee	2007-02-16 11:42:19
in practice it works just like that	by DesertRat66	2007-02-16 12:08:14
An idea strikes!	by ayteebee	2007-02-16 16:00:38
[Oh dear!] [I'm a noob, ok? Be patient with me :)] Could you have a blank as the top round in the clip? That way you could have the first warning shot as a "safe" shot that you "don't have to worry about too much" (Note, I don't like using those terms when it comes to weapons). If the attacker decides to continue the attack... Well you can't exactly say he wasn't warned. The other rounds are all lethal rounds. Heh, tracer would show him you mean business, but I guess it probably wouldn't work over short distances. However I'm under the impression that blanks are unreliable and tend to mess up the firearm (or do you have to specially convert the weapon?), so is this impractical? Does there tend to be much problem in court when the victim has used a firearm to deter an attack? I was just thinking that maybe instead of having a laser marker on the pistol (I've heard you can add them on somewhere) you could have a camera on it, like the camera on a mobile phone. When the safety is set to 'fire' the camera records what the muzzle sees, so the court can see exactly what happened. But then I am obsessed with cameras at the moment. What do you think?
[ Reply ]
I would strongly advise against it	by DesertRat66	2007-02-16 18:41:34

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)