The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Ordnance-Corner for UFies by Ordnance_Corner2007-02-16 10:09:25
  Hey, new cover page. And new intent to kill. by Peace_man2007-02-16 10:17:53
    That is the designed purpose of guns, after all. ( (n/t) by JimK2007-02-16 10:25:18
      Good in theory... by ayteebee 2007-02-16 11:42:19
But in practice it's not quite so straightforward.

- What's the probablilty of her carrying the gun in a quick-draw holster? If she can't get it out in time, then there's exactly the same problem as with the mobile phone; it's useless. Even worse, what if she only manages to get it half out, or if she drops it? Free gun for the assailant? Not a position I'd like to be in.
- What if her reflexes are faster than the assailant's? Or he doesn't see the gun? A black gun against a black jacket in a dark alley in the rain isn't exactly visible. "He isn't stopping. Pull the trigger. F4, f4, f4, he's screaming and there's blood pouring out of his chest."
- In my opinion it is likely to contravene rules 2, 3, 4 AND precautions 1 and 2.
-- Rule 2: Does your daughter really want to be responsible for killing a person?
-- Rule 3: In the heat of the situation is she going to be cool enough to follow this to the letter?
-- Rule 4: Assuming that she does actually have to pull the trigger, the likelihood is that she'll miss the target. Granted, being shot at will probably be enough to scare off the assailant, but who *are* the bullets going to hit?
-- Precaution 1: So nobody's ever going to go through her handbag. Nobody's ever going to see what that lump in her coat pocket is. Can you really guarantee this precaution will be heeded?
-- Precaution 2: She'd have to never go into a pub or nightclub unless she leaves the gun at home. But coming out of a club and walking home is exactly the time she's most likely to be attacked.!

In short she'd have to have lots and lots of training to be able to pull this off (especially to do it "safely"). I think the training would be better used in other self-defence measures and the money spent on a gun would be better invested in one of those alarm thingys and some mace.
[ Reply ]
        WTF? That wasn't supposed to go there!! by ayteebee2007-02-16 11:45:16
          Actually, the MODS part needs to go in the header by SouthpawPL2007-02-16 11:58:03
        Very few people what to be by lheggland2007-02-16 12:01:06
        in practice it works just like that by DesertRat662007-02-16 12:08:14
          You stole my DD/DS term! by jayfarm2007-02-16 12:21:36
            I first heard it 20 years ago, sorry (n/t) by DesertRat662007-02-16 12:30:45
          Which reminds me... I cannot wait until I by lab rat2007-02-16 12:29:02
            You can borrow my .22 and shoot lefty. (n/t) by RetiQlum22007-02-16 12:31:02
              Lefty will not work. Remember I have nerve by lab rat2007-02-16 12:44:24
                D'Oh! I forgot. (n/t) by RetiQlum22007-02-16 13:04:54
          Good response by ayteebee2007-02-16 13:49:26
            Each situation must be judged by it's own merits by DesertRat662007-02-16 14:05:50
            Engage the highest priority threat first. by lheggland2007-02-16 14:06:43
              Yeah, I guess by ayteebee2007-02-16 15:40:33
                Remember the admonition by DesertRat662007-02-16 15:54:33
                  Heh, true, true! (n/t) by ayteebee2007-02-16 16:02:21
          An idea strikes! by ayteebee2007-02-16 16:00:38
            I would strongly advise against it by DesertRat662007-02-16 18:41:34
        Same assumptions, different post by plblark2007-02-16 12:11:09

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)