|
|
Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
|
You be the jury | by SnappingTurtle | 2007-02-16 08:15:20 |
|
Not Their Problem. Legally. | by Havoc | 2007-02-16 08:18:56 |
|
It's not for selling $recalled_food, | by hadji | 2007-02-16 08:30:50 |
|
I disagree, potentially, | by jeff_uk | 2007-02-16 08:34:43 |
|
2 days later doesn't matter. | by hadji | 2007-02-16 08:41:24 |
|
Would a newspaper announcement | by Peace_man | 2007-02-16 08:47:02 |
|
What it comes down to for me is that | by hadji | 2007-02-16 08:53:31 |
| In a case like that, where death or injury are |
by Peace_man |
2007-02-16 09:04:33 |
fairly certain, yes I would.
But I would not want you to phone me and tell me that someone sneezed on the rhubarb I just bought, and that I might catch a potentially fatal cold. This is a question of balancing between the benefit and the required effort and intrusion.
Frankly, I don't know how dangerous salmonella poisoning is. If it is fatal in 5% of cases, and the chances of contracting it from a jar of peanut butter are 1 in 100, then the value of informing everyone is questionable. Depending on how much effort is required, that is. Don't forget - panic is something to avoid as well. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
|
[Todays Cartoon Discussion]
[News Index]
|
|
