|
You be the jury | by SnappingTurtle | 2007-02-16 08:15:20 |
|
Not Their Problem. Legally. | by Havoc | 2007-02-16 08:18:56 |
|
It's not for selling $recalled_food, | by hadji | 2007-02-16 08:30:50 |
| I disagree, potentially, |
by jeff_uk |
2007-02-16 08:34:43 |
In UK (and probably european) Health and Safety law, one key phrase is 'Reasonably Practicable' ('Feasible', in essence) Was it feasible (or even possible) for the company to contact everyone who bought the peanut butter? Maybe they could have sent a letter out, but by then it would have been at least 2 days later, meaning the person in question would have already eaten the contaminated food.
|
|
[ Reply ] |
|
2 days later doesn't matter. | by hadji | 2007-02-16 08:41:24 |
|
Would a newspaper announcement | by Peace_man | 2007-02-16 08:47:02 |
|
What it comes down to for me is that | by hadji | 2007-02-16 08:53:31 |
|
What if you know 100,000 people. | by Jeff_UK | 2007-02-16 08:59:03 |
|
If it was part of my business model that I tracked | by hadji | 2007-02-16 09:16:33 |
|
If that's the case, how effective would your | by Peace_man | 2007-02-16 09:28:07 |
|
If I sent the notification, I've fulfilled my | by hadji | 2007-02-16 09:33:19 |
|
You said it! | by Peace_man | 2007-02-16 10:06:42 |
|
I am not introducing the ability | by hadji | 2007-02-16 11:12:30 |
|
And promptly go bankrupt for paying | by jayfarm | 2007-02-16 11:05:43 |
|
In a case like that, where death or injury are | by Peace_man | 2007-02-16 09:04:33 |
