The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

You be the jury by SnappingTurtle 2007-02-16 08:15:20
This is a hypothetical situation. It is not inspired by any specific event.

Joan goes to BuySmart Grocery Store and buys a jar of Snappy Peanut Butter. Joan lets the checkout clerk scan her BuySmart card. The information on the card traces to a record in BuySmart's database that lists Joan's home address and phone number. The database also lists everything Joan has ever bought at BuySmart using her card.

A day after Joan buys the peanut butter, all Snappy Peanut Butter in the area is recalled due to salmonella poisoning. Immediately upon hearing about the recall, BuySmart removes all Snappy Peanut Butter from their shelves. They also put up little signs in the peanut butter aisle that describe the recall. BuySmart gives refunds on any Snappy Peanut Butter that is in the batches being recalled. That is the full extent of their actions regarding the recall.

The day after the recall, Joan still has not heard about the recall and eats some of the Snappy Peanut Butter. She gets salmonella poisoning and dies.

Joan's husband sues BuySmart Grocery Store because:

  1. They knew about the recall
  2. They knew Joan had bought the peanut butter
  3. They had Joan's contact information
  4. They did not even attempt to let her know about the danger
You be the jury.

[ Reply ]
  hangings to good for em! (n/t) by tesla_koil2007-02-16 08:17:26
  Not Their Problem. Legally. by Havoc2007-02-16 08:18:56
    I Aggree. (n/t) by lheggland2007-02-16 08:25:15
    As I understand german law, by chrisP2007-02-16 08:26:13
    It's not for selling $recalled_food, by hadji2007-02-16 08:30:50
      I disagree, potentially, by jeff_uk2007-02-16 08:34:43
        2 days later doesn't matter. by hadji2007-02-16 08:41:24
          Would a newspaper announcement by Peace_man2007-02-16 08:47:02
            What it comes down to for me is that by hadji2007-02-16 08:53:31
              What if you know 100,000 people. by Jeff_UK2007-02-16 08:59:03
                If it was part of my business model that I tracked by hadji2007-02-16 09:16:33
                  If that's the case, how effective would your by Peace_man2007-02-16 09:28:07
                    If I sent the notification, I've fulfilled my by hadji2007-02-16 09:33:19
                      You said it! by Peace_man2007-02-16 10:06:42
                        I am not introducing the ability by hadji2007-02-16 11:12:30
                  And promptly go bankrupt for paying by jayfarm2007-02-16 11:05:43
              In a case like that, where death or injury are by Peace_man2007-02-16 09:04:33
      I guess the question is how certain death is by Peace_man2007-02-16 08:40:58
        I would say that some effort is always warranted. by hadji2007-02-16 08:44:09
    The only way it *would* be their problem... by jdelphiki2007-02-16 09:02:34
  There was no current recall on the product by kc5sdy2007-02-16 08:24:15
    I misread to an extent. by kc5sdy2007-02-16 08:30:47
  Guilty for some negligence. by vectorz2007-02-16 08:34:06
  As sympathetic to Joan as I would be... by SnappingTurtle2007-02-16 08:34:34
    Notification isn't the reseller's responsibility by andyz2007-02-16 08:48:47
    I agree, however... by VivianC2007-02-16 08:53:59
  Sounds like an extension of... by SlyW2007-02-16 08:37:44
  I'd doubt he would win agains BuySmart by basher202007-02-16 08:39:16
  Failure to render assistance. by moddermonster2007-02-16 08:40:11
    If you follow this reasoning, by vdp2007-02-16 11:53:37
  'Joan' should already know by hyzenthlay2007-02-16 09:06:30
    Not a Lawyer but by wabbit652007-02-16 16:39:58
  It would depend on the nature of the recall. by AndyA2007-02-16 09:09:33
  Using one's personal information... by jdelphiki2007-02-16 09:10:24
  Not enough information. by CynicalRyan2007-02-16 09:29:18
  Does not apply. And that's good it's this way. by Qcumber-some2007-02-16 09:29:49
    Objection. by CynicalRyan2007-02-16 09:50:22
  Terms and Conditions signed at time of card issue by Rattler2007-02-16 10:13:25
    What if none were signed? by SnappingTurtle2007-02-16 10:25:11
      I'm not sure but by Rattler2007-02-16 10:36:56
        Cannot != Not allowed. by CynicalRyan2007-02-16 10:41:29
          Correction - Cannot legally ;P (n/t) by Rattler2007-02-16 11:59:58
      Moot point. by CynicalRyan2007-02-16 10:39:57
  In general.... by jsr2007-02-16 13:03:34

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)