UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Fitzo	by thread_killer	2007-02-16 03:13:35
That whole debate is moot.	by chrisP	2007-02-16 06:07:01
Now you have a different argument entirely	by thread_killer	2007-02-16 06:11:29
As I don't know much about	by chrisP	2007-02-16 06:19:49
If he'd be treated as a POW, he wouldn't be in	by CynicalRyan	2007-02-16 06:21:37
Actually thats wrong (IMO)	by vectorz	2007-02-16 07:05:03
Only somebody captured while actually doing espionage and not wearing an uniform will loose his/ her POW status. And therefore wouldn't be subjected to the rules, i.e. can be tried by a military court (and possible be shot). So if Hicks was caught while pretending to be an Aussie and sneaking into the Embassy, he's a spy. If he was caught guarding a tank he's an combatant (there is a section that deals with combatants not wearing an uniform. Carrying a weapon is enough distinguish apparently). But INAL and I guess more proficient people than us have argued abotu this :)
[ Reply ]

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)