UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

I thought this one was discussed to death already?	by Peace_man	2007-01-25 14:48:02
It's all out of proportion.	by NemoHac	2007-01-25 15:10:48
Maybe not.	by run.dll	2007-01-25 15:18:05
I don't know the rules in the US	by NemoHac	2007-01-25 15:25:01
But in Australia any person who provides a good or serivce always has the (law-protected) right to refuse service on grounds of their choosing. [There is the caveat that anti-dicrimiation laws do impact on that right]. Cabs here do get a license to provide service but are a private enterprise. They are liable to have their licenses revoked but do government at the moment is going to risk religious discrimiation charges. Hence my comment that it's out of proportion... The cabbies should be able to (within reason) refuse service on the basis of their religion but they should mark their cabs as such. Further to that... The airport also has the right to refuse to pass service on to specific cabbies.
[ Reply ]
Except that the cabs are owned by cab companies.	by RetiQlum2	2007-01-25 15:27:57
That is sad.	by Peace_man	2007-01-25 15:28:27
And violence leads to the dark side of the force. (n/t)	by Arachnid	2007-01-25 15:42:16

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)