The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Dual-processor oddity by cpqrst32007-01-25 03:41:27
  Unfortunately not, but I experience the same. by Qcumber-some2007-01-25 03:47:24
    System load by oldphart 2007-01-25 05:30:09
In Windows NT, all system calls were handled by CPU 0. IN OS/2 they were distributed evenly. Most unices seem to be somewhere in between, with one processor (either highest or lowest number) getting more of the system work. Old linux kernels had a tendency to move tasks to the least busy CPU in such a way that it caused extra overhead, I seem to recall a fix to ensure processor affinity a couple years ago. That would mean that a long-running task would stay on the processor it initially was launched on.
[ Reply ]

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)