The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
So... it was effective after all... by fitzso2006-12-13 12:38:50
  Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics by DesertRat662006-12-13 12:55:03
    Isn't that what we always tell you when you by Peace_man2006-12-13 13:00:38
      You have one problem though by DesertRat662006-12-13 13:04:56
        That's Bull, DR by fitzso2006-12-13 13:14:48
          Really? by DesertRat662006-12-13 13:26:52
            *splutters diet coke on screen* by Havoc2006-12-13 13:30:13
              Who says I'm not? by DesertRat662006-12-13 13:43:53
                Dude, there's a MASSIVE difference between by subbywan2006-12-13 14:07:45
                  Not if you research what the founders thought by DesertRat662006-12-13 14:21:31
                    No, they didn't. by Havoc2006-12-13 14:52:13
                      There's other documents by DesertRat662006-12-13 17:52:55
                        Do they apply by fitzso2006-12-13 20:24:05
                          Where do I say they do? by DesertRat662006-12-13 20:51:22
                            When you say 'human right' then you are talking by Peace_man2006-12-13 20:59:23
                              First off by DesertRat662006-12-13 21:16:03
                                I don't know that much about US laws in detail, by Peace_man2006-12-13 21:27:17
                                Both rights can be lost via a felony conviction by DesertRat662006-12-13 21:36:36
                                Then I must be a da-- fool. by fitzso2006-12-13 21:39:54
                                That is your choice, by lheggland2006-12-13 21:45:54
                                at the cost of other people's rights. by fitzso2006-12-13 21:47:57
                                How so? by DesertRat662006-12-13 21:49:47
                                If you kill someone, you have violated his by Peace_man2006-12-13 22:05:11
                                There is plenty basis in law for that by DesertRat662006-12-13 22:16:17
                                It is, however, not a Constitutional right. by Peace_man2006-12-13 22:21:52
                                The group of really smart guys by lheggland2006-12-13 22:25:31
                                Ah, I see. by Peace_man2006-12-13 22:29:24
                                When you are analyzing the intent of by lheggland2006-12-13 22:52:32
                                Heh. You could even look at it another way, too. by Peace_man2006-12-14 00:28:57
                                Well sure let's use your logic by DesertRat66 2006-12-14 07:43:09
Circumstances have changed, the need for a free press, freedom of speech. The right to be secure in ones person, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, are also SO Eighteenth century. Circumstances have changed. We should eliminate or at least severely restrict those as well.
[ Reply ]
                                You forgot about quartering soldiers. (n/t) by RetiQlum22007-05-09 04:42:37

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)