|
So... it was effective after all... | by fitzso | 2006-12-13 12:38:50 |
|
Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 12:55:03 |
|
Isn't that what we always tell you when you | by Peace_man | 2006-12-13 13:00:38 |
|
You have one problem though | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 13:04:56 |
|
That's Bull, DR | by fitzso | 2006-12-13 13:14:48 |
|
Really? | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 13:26:52 |
|
*splutters diet coke on screen* | by Havoc | 2006-12-13 13:30:13 |
|
Who says I'm not? | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 13:43:53 |
|
Dude, there's a MASSIVE difference between | by subbywan | 2006-12-13 14:07:45 |
|
Not if you research what the founders thought | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 14:21:31 |
|
No, they didn't. | by Havoc | 2006-12-13 14:52:13 |
|
There's other documents | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 17:52:55 |
|
Do they apply | by fitzso | 2006-12-13 20:24:05 |
|
Where do I say they do? | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 20:51:22 |
|
When you say 'human right' then you are talking | by Peace_man | 2006-12-13 20:59:23 |
|
First off | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 21:16:03 |
|
I don't know that much about US laws in detail, | by Peace_man | 2006-12-13 21:27:17 |
|
Both rights can be lost via a felony conviction | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 21:36:36 |
|
Then I must be a da-- fool. | by fitzso | 2006-12-13 21:39:54 |
|
That is your choice, | by lheggland | 2006-12-13 21:45:54 |
|
at the cost of other people's rights. | by fitzso | 2006-12-13 21:47:57 |
|
How so? | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 21:49:47 |
|
If you kill someone, you have violated his | by Peace_man | 2006-12-13 22:05:11 |
|
There is plenty basis in law for that | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 22:16:17 |
|
It is, however, not a Constitutional right. | by Peace_man | 2006-12-13 22:21:52 |
|
The group of really smart guys | by lheggland | 2006-12-13 22:25:31 |
|
Ah, I see. | by Peace_man | 2006-12-13 22:29:24 |
| Actually it says exactly what it means |
by DesertRat66 |
2006-12-13 22:38:55 |
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Like the courts are starting to do again you may study the writings of the founders. In so doing you will easily be able to ascertain that they are not referring to hunting arms, nor are they referring ot 18th century muzzle loaders, but to the same guns as were the issue weapons of soldiers in our modern infantry. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
That wasn't the part I was talking about. | by Peace_man | 2006-12-13 23:03:21 |