The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

So... it was effective after all... by fitzso2006-12-13 12:38:50
  Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics by DesertRat662006-12-13 12:55:03
    Isn't that what we always tell you when you by Peace_man2006-12-13 13:00:38
      You have one problem though by DesertRat662006-12-13 13:04:56
        That's Bull, DR by fitzso2006-12-13 13:14:48
          Really? by DesertRat662006-12-13 13:26:52
            *splutters diet coke on screen* by Havoc2006-12-13 13:30:13
              Who says I'm not? by DesertRat662006-12-13 13:43:53
                Dude, there's a MASSIVE difference between by subbywan2006-12-13 14:07:45
                  Not if you research what the founders thought by DesertRat662006-12-13 14:21:31
                    No, they didn't. by Havoc2006-12-13 14:52:13
                      There's other documents by DesertRat662006-12-13 17:52:55
                        Do they apply by fitzso2006-12-13 20:24:05
                          Where do I say they do? by DesertRat662006-12-13 20:51:22
                            When you say 'human right' then you are talking by Peace_man2006-12-13 20:59:23
                              First off by DesertRat662006-12-13 21:16:03
                                I don't know that much about US laws in detail, by Peace_man2006-12-13 21:27:17
                                Both rights can be lost via a felony conviction by DesertRat662006-12-13 21:36:36
                                Then I must be a da-- fool. by fitzso2006-12-13 21:39:54
                                I consider positions like yours more than foolish by DesertRat662006-12-13 21:47:52
                                Why? by fitzso2006-12-13 21:51:26
                                Whose right to live? by DesertRat662006-12-13 22:06:59
                                Your arguments are weak. by Peace_man2006-12-13 22:15:26
                                How do you explain Rwanda? by DesertRat66 2006-12-13 22:32:17
The Tutsis were disarmed by the Hutu government with the help of the UN then slaughtered like cattle.

The difference in countries with low crime rates and low incidence of guns is not one of firearms posession. It is one of culture. Switzerland has a high incidence of gun ownership (I am even aware of Swiss citizens who posess anti-tank weapons) yet they also have a very low crime rate.

As for guns enabling weak criminals, won't happen. Predators weed out the weaklings in their midst. Even if it did, you would still have a majority of society that was neither at a disadvantage, or willing to be victims.
[ Reply ]

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)