|
So... it was effective after all... | by fitzso | 2006-12-13 12:38:50 |
|
Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 12:55:03 |
|
Isn't that what we always tell you when you | by Peace_man | 2006-12-13 13:00:38 |
|
You have one problem though | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 13:04:56 |
|
That's Bull, DR | by fitzso | 2006-12-13 13:14:48 |
|
Really? | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 13:26:52 |
|
*splutters diet coke on screen* | by Havoc | 2006-12-13 13:30:13 |
|
Who says I'm not? | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 13:43:53 |
|
Dude, there's a MASSIVE difference between | by subbywan | 2006-12-13 14:07:45 |
|
Not if you research what the founders thought | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 14:21:31 |
|
No, they didn't. | by Havoc | 2006-12-13 14:52:13 |
|
There's other documents | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 17:52:55 |
|
Do they apply | by fitzso | 2006-12-13 20:24:05 |
|
Where do I say they do? | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 20:51:22 |
|
When you say 'human right' then you are talking | by Peace_man | 2006-12-13 20:59:23 |
|
First off | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 21:16:03 |
|
I don't know that much about US laws in detail, | by Peace_man | 2006-12-13 21:27:17 |
|
Both rights can be lost via a felony conviction | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 21:36:36 |
|
Then I must be a da-- fool. | by fitzso | 2006-12-13 21:39:54 |
|
That is your choice, | by lheggland | 2006-12-13 21:45:54 |
|
at the cost of other people's rights. | by fitzso | 2006-12-13 21:47:57 |
|
How so? | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 21:49:47 |
|
If you kill someone, you have violated his | by Peace_man | 2006-12-13 22:05:11 |
|
There is plenty basis in law for that | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 22:16:17 |
|
It is, however, not a Constitutional right. | by Peace_man | 2006-12-13 22:21:52 |
|
The group of really smart guys | by lheggland | 2006-12-13 22:25:31 |
| Ah, I see. |
by Peace_man |
2006-12-13 22:29:24 |
The Constitution you are talking about then is one composed partly of unwritten parts that are simply understood?
OK - I guess you win. Your constitution is much better than the one I've heard about. After all, it will always say exactly what you want it to say. It's simply common sense. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Actually it says exactly what it means | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 22:38:55 |
|
That wasn't the part I was talking about. | by Peace_man | 2006-12-13 23:03:21 |
|
When you are analyzing the intent of | by lheggland | 2006-12-13 22:52:32 |
|
Seconded | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 22:57:54 |
|
Heh. You could even look at it another way, too. | by Peace_man | 2006-12-14 00:28:57 |
|
Well sure let's use your logic | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-14 07:43:09 |
|
You forgot about quartering soldiers. (n/t) | by RetiQlum2 | 2007-05-09 04:42:37 |