|
So... it was effective after all... | by fitzso | 2006-12-13 12:38:50 |
|
Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 12:55:03 |
|
Isn't that what we always tell you when you | by Peace_man | 2006-12-13 13:00:38 |
|
You have one problem though | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 13:04:56 |
|
That's Bull, DR | by fitzso | 2006-12-13 13:14:48 |
|
Really? | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 13:26:52 |
|
*splutters diet coke on screen* | by Havoc | 2006-12-13 13:30:13 |
|
Who says I'm not? | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 13:43:53 |
|
Dude, there's a MASSIVE difference between | by subbywan | 2006-12-13 14:07:45 |
|
Not if you research what the founders thought | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 14:21:31 |
|
No, they didn't. | by Havoc | 2006-12-13 14:52:13 |
|
There's other documents | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 17:52:55 |
|
Do they apply | by fitzso | 2006-12-13 20:24:05 |
|
Where do I say they do? | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 20:51:22 |
|
When you say 'human right' then you are talking | by Peace_man | 2006-12-13 20:59:23 |
|
First off | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 21:16:03 |
|
I don't know that much about US laws in detail, | by Peace_man | 2006-12-13 21:27:17 |
|
Both rights can be lost via a felony conviction | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 21:36:36 |
|
Then I must be a da-- fool. | by fitzso | 2006-12-13 21:39:54 |
|
That is your choice, | by lheggland | 2006-12-13 21:45:54 |
|
at the cost of other people's rights. | by fitzso | 2006-12-13 21:47:57 |
|
How so? | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 21:49:47 |
|
If you kill someone, you have violated his | by Peace_man | 2006-12-13 22:05:11 |
|
There is plenty basis in law for that | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 22:16:17 |
| It is, however, not a Constitutional right. |
by Peace_man |
2006-12-13 22:21:52 |
Does this mean that there are laws that override Constitutional rights. Even Human rights? How can that be?
Or is it just that precedent has allowed common usage to negate the rights guaranteed in the Constitution? |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
The law is an implementation of the right | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 22:23:36 |
|
What does the law say about protecting | by Peace_man | 2006-12-13 22:24:45 |
|
Absolutely nothing | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 22:34:24 |
|
That is must be justified. | by lheggland | 2006-12-13 22:37:53 |
|
s/is/it (n/t) | by lheggland | 2006-12-13 22:38:32 |
|
No, I don't. | by Peace_man | 2006-12-14 00:25:42 |
|
The group of really smart guys | by lheggland | 2006-12-13 22:25:31 |
|
Ah, I see. | by Peace_man | 2006-12-13 22:29:24 |
|
Actually it says exactly what it means | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 22:38:55 |
|
That wasn't the part I was talking about. | by Peace_man | 2006-12-13 23:03:21 |
|
When you are analyzing the intent of | by lheggland | 2006-12-13 22:52:32 |
|
Seconded | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-13 22:57:54 |
|
Heh. You could even look at it another way, too. | by Peace_man | 2006-12-14 00:28:57 |
|
Well sure let's use your logic | by DesertRat66 | 2006-12-14 07:43:09 |
|
You forgot about quartering soldiers. (n/t) | by RetiQlum2 | 2007-05-09 04:42:37 |