The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
DNA should be taken from babies (to fight crime) by DesertRat662006-12-13 10:23:58
  I like the honesty by varikin2006-12-13 10:47:00
    Shouldn't even be up for discussion IMO by DesertRat662006-12-13 10:51:01
      *blinks* by subbywan2006-12-13 10:53:00
        How about by DesertRat662006-12-13 10:55:26
          They already ID you at birth. by subbywan2006-12-13 10:57:48
            Not always by DesertRat662006-12-13 10:59:38
              But it's still fairly common, even if not by subbywan 2006-12-13 11:01:49
everywhere.

Plus, there are a host of other reasons it can be useful: ID'ing John/Jane Doe's, determining paternity without expensive tests, etc
[ Reply ]
                Without expensive tests? How so? by Sharku2006-12-13 11:14:05
                  because I'm thinking if they *already* by subbywan2006-12-13 11:22:48
                Just because something has some benefits by DesertRat662006-12-13 11:19:28
                  But just because it *MAY* have bad by subbywan2006-12-13 11:21:47
                    You would have to weigh the differences by DesertRat662006-12-13 11:30:46
                      You could argue both of them either way. by subbywan2006-12-13 11:38:23
                    But I see it as the reverse... by jdelphiki2006-12-13 12:06:38
                      No, it doesn't hinder us at all. by subbywan2006-12-13 12:12:44
                        At what cost? by jdelphiki2006-12-13 12:26:46
                          "a huge intrusion on the rights and freedoms"? by Khaar2006-12-13 12:33:47
                            I explained... by jdelphiki2006-12-13 13:22:15
                              so then you're not against them having it, by subbywan2006-12-13 13:28:05
                                I'm quite against them having it... by jdelphiki2006-12-13 13:38:30
                                That's your responsibility. by subbywan2006-12-13 13:40:08
                                The problem is by MatthewDBA2006-12-13 13:41:28
                                That's true, to a degree. by subbywan2006-12-13 13:45:48
                                That's why... by jdelphiki2006-12-13 15:12:36
                                On the GPS thing ... by subbywan2006-12-13 15:14:32
                                Not only Disney, Verizon Wireless too. (n/t) by shorty822006-12-13 17:15:26
                                If such abuses were overt... by jdelphiki2006-12-13 13:45:17
                                See, I have no problem with a DNA DB. by subbywan2006-12-13 13:47:39
                                On such a large scale process... by jdelphiki2006-12-13 15:21:50
                                I see it just the other way around. by subbywan2006-12-13 15:31:42
                          Why does it have to be ONLY for criminals? by subbywan2006-12-13 12:37:54
                            None of the items you listed... by jdelphiki2006-12-13 13:28:12
                              That ones easy: by subbywan2006-12-13 13:38:31
                                DNA can already be used... by jdelphiki2006-12-13 15:08:06
                                I see more good things that can come of it by subbywan2006-12-13 15:17:10
                But it's *hospital* records. by zelda2006-12-13 12:28:16
                  So why can't DNA be the same? (n/t) by subbywan2006-12-13 12:38:20
                    Consarn article is crashing my browser. by zelda2006-12-13 12:46:44
                      That's also merely *1* way of doing it. by subbywan2006-12-13 12:53:29
                        Well, that *is* the idea by zelda2006-12-13 12:58:44
                          It already got off the initial point around by subbywan2006-12-13 13:04:05

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)