The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Is this being snobbish? by hadji2006-11-20 13:06:36
  when it comes down to it by tyebald2006-11-20 13:22:57
    I believe it was Arthur C Clarke who said, by Arachnid 2006-11-20 13:28:17
when asked what his religion was, "the scientific method". His reasoning being that a religion is the thing that you believe on in faith, with no evidence to support it. The scientific method is the presumption that we can learn more about how the world works by examining it, testing it, and drawing logical conclusions, and as such can't be proven. However, if we make the assumption that the scientific method is accurate, all the rest stands on its back.
[ Reply ]
      Exactly. It's a _practical_ set of axioms by hobbs2006-11-20 13:58:27
        Why is that first axiom necessary? by Esteis2006-11-20 14:07:00
          What if it was false? by decius2006-11-20 14:12:13
      That is not right. by BloodyViking2006-11-20 14:14:16
        You have to believe that the logical reasoning by Arachnid2006-11-20 14:23:32
          I don't see it. by BloodyViking2006-11-20 15:04:31
            Postulate: Logical reasoning doesn't work. by decius2006-11-20 15:09:46

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)