UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Senior Democrat Calls for Reinstatemment of Draft	by DesertRat66	2006-11-20 08:03:58
Let me tell you why I think it's bad:	by fitzso	2006-11-20 11:22:47
Now hang on	by MatthewDBA	2006-11-20 11:31:47
First of all, "teach them to kill" is a very emotionally loaded phrase. There is a difference between being taught to use a weapon and being taught to kill using that weapon. (It's not a big enough difference for me that I could make myself do it, but that's because of me - I can still see the distinction.) The conscriptees might or might not be "shipped halfway across the world"; if this is offered as a general and more or less ongoing program, then they would quite possibly remain at home. As far as the example of the Vietnam War, I believe that there are programs in place to help veterans deal with shell shock/battle fatigue/PTSD; I don't think those programs were in place during or immediately after that war.
[ Reply ]
Indeed, most mental disorders associated with war	by Arman X	2006-11-20 11:35:49
How about using Prevention rather than	by fitzso	2006-11-20 12:20:05
It's different	by MatthewDBA	2006-11-20 12:33:13
Si vis Pacem, para Bellum (n/t)	by DesertRat66	2006-11-20 12:35:49
Or Pope John Paul's version	by MatthewDBA	2006-11-20 12:38:14
Sorry, but I don't buy that	by fitzso	2006-11-20 13:40:30
The "because they'll use them"	by MatthewDBA	2006-11-20 13:46:02
It's been proven to me that America would	by fitzso	2006-11-20 14:19:05
legal point there:	by subbywan	2006-11-20 14:24:28
Yes, used in an ongoing war to end it quicker.	by esbita	2006-11-20 13:46:55

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)