| Senior Democrat Calls for Reinstatemment of Draft |
by DesertRat66 |
2006-11-20 08:03:58 |
(story)
I for one support Rep. Rangel in his call to reinstate the draft and I hope his legislation gets passed. I do hope it eliminates the college exemption though. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Yes to the Draft | by duano | 2006-11-20 08:08:39 |
|
Wonder if this choice will be made by the .gov or | by theanomaly | 2006-11-20 08:10:20 |
|
The needs of the military | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-20 08:38:17 |
|
Conscientious Objectors | by MatthewDBA | 2006-11-20 08:43:11 |
|
All a matter of opinion I guess | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-20 08:44:49 |
|
I could not fire a gun under orders | by MatthewDBA | 2006-11-20 08:47:21 |
|
Shoot the sarge. That would stop the orders. | by klar_at_work | 2006-11-20 08:50:39 |
|
Yeah, and the last order you'll hear... | by Sharku | 2006-11-20 10:12:10 |
|
Inexperience rears it head... | by surfdude | 2006-11-20 09:08:45 |
|
No | by MatthewDBA | 2006-11-20 09:12:16 |
|
that's not a problem. Unless you're a sniper | by subbywan | 2006-11-20 10:37:50 |
|
Would I be ordered | by MatthewDBA | 2006-11-20 10:45:17 |
|
That's OK | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-20 10:49:03 |
|
That I wouldn't necessarily object to | by MatthewDBA | 2006-11-20 10:52:29 |
|
As a cook, the only time you would have to fire a | by Arman X | 2006-11-20 11:23:19 |
|
I don't know that I could avoid | by MatthewDBA | 2006-11-20 11:26:02 |
|
Naw putting the sarges face on the paper targe | by joecrouse | 2006-11-20 14:11:56 |
|
Yep youd get sent to basic | by joecrouse | 2006-11-20 14:10:49 |
|
well, infantry is THE most common MOS | by subbywan | 2006-11-20 10:49:12 |
|
I don't think I could go out on combat patrols | by MatthewDBA | 2006-11-20 10:53:53 |
|
You wouldn't have to. | by subbywan | 2006-11-20 10:54:36 |
|
Scary | by MatthewDBA | 2006-11-20 10:58:32 |
|
could do what the chaplins officially do | by subbywan | 2006-11-20 11:11:57 |
|
That would have to be it | by MatthewDBA | 2006-11-20 11:14:00 |
|
Be a medic. THey only carry a 9mm | by joecrouse | 2006-11-20 14:13:36 |
|
I couldn't live with myself | by fitzso | 2006-11-20 11:14:42 |
|
Could you | by MatthewDBA | 2006-11-20 11:17:13 |
|
I could | by fitzso | 2006-11-20 12:27:54 |
|
While I do respect many military people, | by Nath3 | 2006-11-20 09:45:48 |
|
Really? Quakers founded Pennsylvania | by Silverfire | 2006-11-20 19:37:34 |
|
Seconded. | by Ravenlock | 2006-11-20 08:45:41 |
|
his/her, that is. (n/t) | by Ravenlock | 2006-11-20 08:46:42 |
|
The catch there... | by jdelphiki | 2006-11-20 08:52:18 |
|
How about taking it from the military budget? | by Peace_man | 2006-11-20 08:58:25 |
|
Well that's easy | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-20 10:20:48 |
|
That one is boardering on a Fluffy Pink Bunny. | by talon0720 | 2006-11-20 09:49:17 |
|
Yeah, how about them cowards eh. (n/t) | by theanomaly | 2006-11-20 09:50:41 |
|
(sarcasm tags for above, btw) (n/t) | by theanomaly | 2006-11-20 09:55:51 |
|
Yes I am | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-20 10:15:17 |
|
So one Democrat talking about instating the draft | by talon0720 | 2006-11-20 11:28:20 |
|
Why not? People think Bush apparently | by subbywan | 2006-11-20 11:35:36 |
|
In other words: standard political sniping | by Concept | 2006-11-20 11:37:36 |
|
it's pretty much ALWAYS business as usual :P | by subbywan | 2006-11-20 11:38:58 |
|
hence the term "as usual" :-P (n/t) | by MatthewDBA | 2006-11-20 11:40:53 |
|
Not just the party, the entire country. | by vetitice | 2006-11-20 11:38:22 |
|
Not exactly | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-20 11:52:29 |
|
Yaay for blind dumb obedience. | by vetitice | 2006-11-20 12:02:56 |
|
You said it. (n/t) | by fitzso | 2006-11-20 13:51:13 |
|
Keep in mind | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-20 11:50:09 |
|
Might I point out | by talon0720 | 2006-11-20 12:42:41 |
|
Sen. Conyers | by Silverfire | 2006-11-20 19:43:51 |
|
Amish are automaticaly exempted | by joecrouse | 2006-11-20 14:15:58 |
|
question there: | by subbywan | 2006-11-20 14:21:20 |
|
Generaly speaking (Note I am no where near | by joecrouse | 2006-11-20 14:23:16 |
|
okie :) (n/t) | by subbywan | 2006-11-20 14:24:55 |
|
That being said even with 1 eye | by joecrouse | 2006-11-20 16:10:39 |
|
I'll bend my steel to your will, sir! | by Hactar the Uhhh | 2006-11-20 08:14:24 |
|
You're beyond the draft age, aren't you? :P (n/t) | by esbita | 2006-11-20 08:19:02 |
|
*Flashes driver's license* | by Hactar the Uhhh | 2006-11-20 08:20:43 |
|
Sounds like cannon fodder to me. (n/t) | by klar_at_work | 2006-11-20 08:51:14 |
|
You couldn't possibly know this, but | by Hactar the Uhhh | 2006-11-20 09:10:23 |
|
But then you did it for earning a living | by zoxer | 2006-11-20 11:18:19 |
|
That's true, | by Hactar the Uhhh | 2006-11-20 12:10:24 |
|
You were a BUS DRIVER!. (just messing with ya) (n (n/t) | by joecrouse | 2006-11-20 14:17:45 |
|
Also, you've every right | by Hactar the Uhhh | 2006-11-20 09:14:29 |
|
It'd get more young people to vote that's for sure | by esbita | 2006-11-20 08:18:33 |
|
Well for one it would free up the professionals | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-20 08:41:17 |
|
I get this idea about a Heinlein book: | by klar_at_work | 2006-11-20 08:52:58 |
|
The usual reference is | by hyzenthlay | 2006-11-20 08:56:20 |
|
Revolt in 2100 was totally different story :P (n/t) | by esbita | 2006-11-20 10:05:39 |
|
Was? | by MatthewDBA | 2006-11-20 10:19:46 |
|
My 100th b-day will be in 2081 | by esbita | 2006-11-20 10:22:36 |
|
Huh | by MatthewDBA | 2006-11-20 10:28:07 |
|
Linky to discussion yesterday | by ixeian | 2006-11-20 08:22:17 |
|
Should save the US some money, too. | by leistico | 2006-11-20 08:23:11 |
|
Slave laborers? | by MatthewDBA | 2006-11-20 08:27:17 |
|
Sure, why bother with an education when you can be | by kelli217 | 2006-11-20 08:30:11 |
|
Exactly | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-20 08:36:22 |
|
As long as that 'higher' education wont be | by klar_at_work | 2006-11-20 09:00:19 |
|
That's up to fate | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-20 10:12:50 |
|
Will he include females? | by hyzenthlay | 2006-11-20 08:31:37 |
|
I would hope so | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-20 08:32:32 |
|
If he makes the claim | by hyzenthlay | 2006-11-20 08:44:19 |
|
So if it is a /benefit/, | by krikkert | 2006-11-20 09:18:48 |
|
indeed | by fitzso | 2006-11-20 13:47:37 |
|
Not for long. | by krikkert | 2006-11-20 14:04:42 |
|
That's just wrong. | by fitzso | 2006-11-20 14:31:23 |
|
Plus, as long as there are a few men left | by subbywan | 2006-11-20 14:33:23 |
|
Introverts do well in the army | by joecrouse | 2006-11-20 14:21:39 |
|
DR Stop channelling Hadji : | by klar_at_work | 2006-11-20 08:44:42 |
|
No to the Draft. | by klar_at_work | 2006-11-20 08:49:14 |
|
"Anticipatory Retaliation" is the core of all | by Havoc | 2006-11-20 10:39:14 |
|
Similar to the following: | by theanomaly | 2006-11-20 10:47:01 |
|
One more point. | by kelli217 | 2006-11-20 11:43:07 |
|
And if your neighbor has similar tactical sense | by vetitice | 2006-11-20 11:54:13 |
|
we have that its called the peace corp. (n/t) | by joecrouse | 2006-11-20 14:24:07 |
|
way to many gravestones | by robertltux | 2006-11-20 18:04:59 |
|
The problem with the Word "Draft" in the U.S. is | by Classic_Jon | 2006-11-20 08:51:22 |
|
If only vets can vote... | by Nath3 | 2006-11-20 09:53:39 |
|
we're ~60% there already | by plblark | 2006-11-20 09:59:37 |
|
Was going to say, you'll need a larger carrot | by Concept | 2006-11-20 10:07:17 |
|
And sadly, per a thread last week, that ia a | by Classic_Jon | 2006-11-20 10:07:51 |
|
In other news, a sudden temperature drop was | by Peace_man | 2006-11-20 08:51:40 |
|
Unfortuneately I think the rest of the world would | by Classic_Jon | 2006-11-20 08:56:19 |
|
There could easily be that perception, yes. | by Peace_man | 2006-11-20 09:03:37 |
|
It is not possible to do it and not raise military | by Classic_Jon | 2006-11-20 09:12:03 |
|
OK, I might have misspoken with that 'eager' | by Peace_man | 2006-11-20 09:19:25 |
|
I agree but in the short term it would cause | by Classic_Jon | 2006-11-20 09:45:00 |
|
Look at other countries with conscription. | by krikkert | 2006-11-20 09:24:10 |
|
*waits for the inevitable* (n/t) | by Sharku | 2006-11-20 09:25:13 |
|
Conscription could work. | by shorty82 | 2006-11-20 09:33:11 |
|
Clarifying my definitions.. | by krikkert | 2006-11-20 09:40:22 |
|
Those are my definitions pretty much. | by shorty82 | 2006-11-20 09:56:24 |
|
After reading all that is said in here, there is | by klar_at_work | 2006-11-20 08:54:37 |
|
Not necessarily | by MatthewDBA | 2006-11-20 08:59:06 |
|
Out of curiosity, | by Ravenlock | 2006-11-20 08:55:34 |
|
Both | by Havoc | 2006-11-20 09:06:18 |
|
I'm not sure what the purpose would be | by MatthewDBA | 2006-11-20 09:09:39 |
|
The basic training is thorough enough | by Havoc | 2006-11-20 10:36:16 |
|
As far as | by MatthewDBA | 2006-11-20 10:40:10 |
|
but the costs and logistics of that would be | by plblark | 2006-11-20 10:41:08 |
|
But you would be slowly building a | by Havoc | 2006-11-20 12:35:30 |
|
"hopefully" | by MatthewDBA | 2006-11-20 12:37:19 |
|
Youd be suprised what a marine corps | by joecrouse | 2006-11-20 19:59:41 |
|
Perhaps but considering the number | by Silverfire | 2006-11-20 20:08:59 |
|
Why on earth treat females like that? (n/t) | by hyzenthlay | 2006-11-20 09:11:14 |
|
American females | by Hactar the Uhhh | 2006-11-20 09:12:39 |
|
Lower Standards | by surfdude | 2006-11-20 09:34:04 |
|
How does the Israeli army handle female soldiers? (n/t) | by vdp | 2006-11-20 09:37:43 |
|
Set the approrpiate standards and let people pass | by Concept | 2006-11-20 09:39:08 |
|
Well said! | by Hactar the Uhhh | 2006-11-20 09:47:39 |
|
Exactly. If I were a bigger woman | by esbita | 2006-11-20 10:27:29 |
|
And? | by hyzenthlay | 2006-11-20 10:17:50 |
|
not been there or done that but | by plblark | 2006-11-20 10:27:26 |
|
Your example is a good one. (n/t) | by theanomaly | 2006-11-20 10:34:26 |
|
A force comprised of women | by hyzenthlay | 2006-11-20 10:57:04 |
|
Yes. Give some one Esbitas size | by joecrouse | 2006-11-20 20:02:56 |
|
It would be a good idea to make service | by Peace_man | 2006-11-20 09:14:24 |
|
s/Storm/Starship (n/t) | by Nath3 | 2006-11-20 09:36:32 |
|
Ooops! Sorry about that. (n/t) | by Peace_man | 2006-11-20 09:38:49 |
|
Agreed! *pounds gavel* Done and DONE! | by Havoc | 2006-11-20 10:30:37 |
|
Absolutley | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-20 10:28:07 |
|
That is just stupid. | by BloodyViking | 2006-11-20 13:18:08 |
|
No that's life | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-20 13:32:56 |
|
No, that's Not "life". | by BloodyViking | 2006-11-20 13:57:50 |
|
This makes considerably more sense to me as well. (n/t) | by Ravenlock | 2006-11-20 15:15:33 |
|
Ah but an informed individual | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-20 16:20:28 |
|
Not true. Education doesnt mean squat | by joecrouse | 2006-11-20 20:07:56 |
|
And not everyone SHOULD be in college | by subbywan | 2006-11-20 20:10:00 |
|
College was a waste of 2 years and thousands of | by joecrouse | 2006-11-20 20:12:32 |
|
Add an annual reserve call for 2-4 weeks | by shminux | 2006-11-20 09:15:52 |
|
Good idea. | by Peace_man | 2006-11-20 09:21:30 |
|
From reading this thread this looks more like | by shorty82 | 2006-11-20 09:29:48 |
|
nope draft was in full effect from 1914 | by joecrouse | 2006-11-20 20:09:31 |
|
I haven't seen this addressed in comments yet ... | by iarann | 2006-11-20 09:30:28 |
|
krikkert mentioned this as a major reason | by Peace_man | 2006-11-20 09:36:00 |
|
And what I was getting at on voter turnout | by esbita | 2006-11-20 10:21:25 |
|
I have a life logistics question... | by Concept | 2006-11-20 10:02:34 |
|
i'm 32 with two kids and a wife | by plblark | 2006-11-20 10:31:36 |
|
Here's a thought. | by theanomaly | 2006-11-20 10:42:07 |
|
This is exactly the gist of my question. (n/t) | by Concept | 2006-11-20 10:55:47 |
|
When you're called | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-20 10:35:12 |
|
What happens to your family? | by MatthewDBA | 2006-11-20 10:48:01 |
|
Military family housing is available | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-20 10:57:00 |
|
So someone who has spent the last... | by RetiQlum2 | 2006-11-20 10:59:45 |
|
IIRC they would be protected from debt collection | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-20 11:10:28 |
|
thats the way i remember it | by joecrouse | 2006-11-20 20:13:37 |
|
If you're in service, they CANNOT foreclose | by subbywan | 2006-11-20 11:14:47 |
|
I'd imagine | by MatthewDBA | 2006-11-20 11:20:30 |
|
Oh, definitely. May even force them to change | by subbywan | 2006-11-20 11:22:36 |
|
The military attorneys | by MatthewDBA | 2006-11-20 11:25:00 |
|
No. Remember, they're up against the Govt. | by subbywan | 2006-11-20 11:27:03 |
|
I'd still bet | by MatthewDBA | 2006-11-20 11:33:09 |
|
Class action suits. | by subbywan | 2006-11-20 11:37:30 |
|
Point taken (n/t) | by MatthewDBA | 2006-11-20 11:38:23 |
|
My brother is active service and had to deal with | by subbywan | 2006-11-20 11:42:53 |
|
There would be once they drafted them. :) (n/t) | by Nea | 2006-11-20 11:40:34 |
|
Jag is swift, Jag doesnt play soft ball. | by joecrouse | 2006-11-20 20:15:09 |
|
So my wife would lose her job? | by MatthewDBA | 2006-11-20 11:01:44 |
|
Possibly | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-20 11:12:27 |
|
This is an excellent question, and... | by Ravenlock | 2006-11-20 10:57:56 |
|
There are various laws in place to protect you | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-20 11:02:39 |
|
Ravenlock If you wife has all that consider this. | by joecrouse | 2006-11-20 20:18:46 |
|
It's something she's considered, | by Ravenlock | 2006-11-20 23:03:15 |
|
You misread my question, apparently | by Concept | 2006-11-20 11:06:15 |
|
I have major problems with this | by basher20 | 2006-11-20 10:34:39 |
|
Why not | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-20 10:46:28 |
|
So you're offering this up as | by basher20 | 2006-11-20 11:05:18 |
|
I'm not offering anything | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-20 11:08:43 |
|
Are you just jerking us around, here? | by Ravenlock | 2006-11-20 15:32:58 |
|
So, first you post this article and say you agree | by ixeian | 2006-11-20 11:37:34 |
|
If it happened two weeks ago | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-20 11:56:39 |
|
I think it did | by ixeian | 2006-11-20 12:24:06 |
|
Not really at this time | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-20 12:31:06 |
|
a good quote on politics | by plblark | 2006-11-20 10:53:18 |
|
If this passes... | by RetiQlum2 | 2006-11-20 11:12:45 |
|
And people said the Republicans would be the prob. (n/t) | by subbywan | 2006-11-20 11:15:38 |
|
Shirk your patriotic duty?! | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-20 11:15:52 |
|
Would you mind not taking parts of this | by Peace_man | 2006-11-20 12:19:42 |
|
Yes I would in fact | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-20 12:27:00 |
|
Then why ask Retiqlum2 not to reply | by Peace_man | 2006-11-20 12:31:21 |
|
Simple | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-20 12:48:11 |
|
If it relates to this thread, it should be on the | by Peace_man | 2006-11-20 12:50:48 |
|
Um, no. If things are going outside the realm of | by subbywan | 2006-11-20 12:55:16 |
|
I have to disagree there. | by Peace_man | 2006-11-20 13:38:37 |
|
You're allowed to disagree | by subbywan | 2006-11-20 13:44:24 |
|
Oh, certainly. Things can be taken off board. | by Peace_man | 2006-11-20 14:00:07 |
|
Then if something is not acceptable to board | by subbywan | 2006-11-20 14:03:11 |
|
Are you deliberately obtuse? I answered that | by Peace_man | 2006-11-20 14:05:30 |
|
Poorly | by subbywan | 2006-11-20 14:13:37 |
|
Did you forget something? | by Peace_man | 2006-11-20 14:27:37 |
|
I think you misinterpreted the post. | by subbywan | 2006-11-20 14:35:36 |
|
How is it necessarily your business... | by esbita | 2006-11-20 13:44:39 |
|
It has been mentioned before that it is | by Peace_man | 2006-11-20 14:02:10 |
|
If someone has a grievance with another person, | by krikkert | 2006-11-20 13:55:09 |
|
It is established policy not to take things | by Peace_man | 2006-11-20 14:03:55 |
|
It is established policy not to take | by krikkert | 2006-11-20 14:11:09 |
|
Peace_man dirty jokes | by joecrouse | 2006-11-20 20:23:06 |
|
Patriotic duty my rear end, DR | by fitzso | 2006-11-20 14:03:14 |
|
All well and good, | by moongoddess | 2006-11-20 11:15:14 |
|
Actually, at least one of the Bush twins has | by subbywan | 2006-11-20 11:17:28 |
|
Let me tell you why I think it's bad: | by fitzso | 2006-11-20 11:22:47 |
|
Now hang on | by MatthewDBA | 2006-11-20 11:31:47 |
|
Indeed, most mental disorders associated with war | by Arman X | 2006-11-20 11:35:49 |
|
How about using Prevention rather than | by fitzso | 2006-11-20 12:20:05 |
|
It's different | by MatthewDBA | 2006-11-20 12:33:13 |
|
Si vis Pacem, para Bellum (n/t) | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-20 12:35:49 |
|
Or Pope John Paul's version | by MatthewDBA | 2006-11-20 12:38:14 |
|
Sorry, but I don't buy that | by fitzso | 2006-11-20 13:40:30 |
|
The "because they'll use them" | by MatthewDBA | 2006-11-20 13:46:02 |
|
It's been proven to me that America would | by fitzso | 2006-11-20 14:19:05 |
|
legal point there: | by subbywan | 2006-11-20 14:24:28 |
|
Yes, used in an ongoing war to end it quicker. | by esbita | 2006-11-20 13:46:55 |
|
Appeal to emotion; using loaded terms. | by krikkert | 2006-11-20 13:52:20 |
|
What loaded terms? | by fitzso | 2006-11-20 14:26:40 |
|
One big one that stood out for me was: | by subbywan | 2006-11-20 14:32:00 |
|
I disagree | by fitzso | 2006-11-20 14:50:02 |
|
Unfortunately, we don't know whether "some" | by subbywan | 2006-11-20 14:57:26 |
|
That's sadly very true. | by fitzso | 2006-11-20 15:15:45 |
|
"risking the sanity of millions"? | by krikkert | 2006-11-20 15:19:00 |
|
And how well-trained is a draftee? | by fitzso | 2006-11-20 15:27:21 |
|
Most of them are a mixture, | by krikkert | 2006-11-20 15:29:27 |
|
CS wanna bees anyone | by robertltux | 2006-11-20 17:40:00 |
|
Sorry, that makes no sense at all (n/t) | by fitzso | 2006-11-20 18:18:29 |
|
DI's talk that way | by joecrouse | 2006-11-20 20:31:30 |
|
Did anyone believe DR66 was serious? | by vetitice | 2006-11-20 11:43:02 |
|
I think he's being gleeful about how quickly the | by Concept | 2006-11-20 11:46:49 |
|
It's a happy thing to get ones schadenfreude back. | by vetitice | 2006-11-20 11:50:37 |
|
As if the attitude you show is any credit... | by esbita | 2006-11-20 12:00:44 |
|
My aisles are half a world away. | by vetitice | 2006-11-20 12:16:18 |
|
Talk to those who DON'T vote. (n/t) | by subbywan | 2006-11-20 12:20:43 |
|
When will we? | by MatthewDBA | 2006-11-20 12:20:51 |
|
Let me rephrase... | by esbita | 2006-11-20 12:22:00 |
|
Oh, good point. | by vetitice | 2006-11-20 12:38:33 |
|
How is that ANY different from the Liberals | by subbywan | 2006-11-20 12:53:18 |
|
Not in the slightest and I hate them for it too :) | by vetitice | 2006-11-20 12:59:01 |
|
Not really. | by RetiQlum2 | 2006-11-20 11:50:01 |
|
Dunno about him, but I'd totally support it | by subbywan | 2006-11-20 11:51:42 |
|
You mean national service/conscription or draft? (n/t) | by vetitice | 2006-11-20 11:55:04 |
|
Both/all. (n/t) | by subbywan | 2006-11-20 11:58:48 |
|
Yes, I do | by fitzso | 2006-11-20 12:20:51 |
|
I have no reason to believe it wasn't. | by Peace_man | 2006-11-20 12:27:39 |
|
s/it/the TLP/ (on re-reading the question). (n/t) | by Peace_man | 2006-11-20 12:33:51 |
|
If you check the archives | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-20 12:38:42 |
|
Any idea what Retiqlum2 is talking about | by Peace_man | 2006-11-20 12:48:48 |
|
Not really | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-20 12:57:44 |
|
Real simple: | by RetiQlum2 | 2006-11-20 13:01:34 |
|
And for the record: | by RetiQlum2 | 2006-11-20 13:04:08 |
|
I need to learn to recognize irony? | by Peace_man | 2006-11-20 13:35:58 |
|
No Cryptography and Missdirection | by joecrouse | 2006-11-20 20:33:26 |
|
I did at least at first, but... | by Ravenlock | 2006-11-20 15:41:11 |
|
Anyone want to start a pragmatism party? | by vetitice | 2006-11-20 15:52:18 |
|
Yes, but | by subbywan | 2006-11-20 15:57:44 |
|
Not very pragmatic. (n/t) | by vetitice | 2006-11-20 16:40:13 |
|
That's just you don't know the REAL me :P (n/t) | by subbywan | 2006-11-20 16:50:53 |
|
Sure, I'm in. | by Ravenlock | 2006-11-20 17:28:49 |
|
See!! (n/t) | by subbywan | 2006-11-20 17:38:00 |
|
Let's retroactively draft... | by Phoon | 2006-11-20 14:33:41 |
|
Feel free to try | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-20 14:35:06 |