UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

For the curious	by UGuardian	2006-11-05 03:31:41
Ummmm, they are wrong, BTW.	by Havoc	2006-11-05 11:59:02
Under federal law, child pornography is defined as visual depiction of minors. This includes art, drawings, paintings, etc. This has been upheld and charges brought, prosecuted, and convictions obtained. They had BETTER disallow such things, since federal law holds sway. Now as for the pictures being of animals, that blurs the line, but I seriously doubt the folks at DA wanna deal with the possibility of being shut down and convicted for child porn.
[ Reply ]
I'm Assuming that you are referig to AMERICAN law?	by hieraco	2006-11-05 14:54:44
That is the law in several countries	by Havoc	2006-11-05 15:14:24
Besides, it's also against DA's rules.	by Havoc	2006-11-05 15:20:59
He siad it is like DA not that it was DA	by hieraco	2006-11-05 15:59:24
I did miss that, actually	by Havoc	2006-11-05 16:19:58
Technically it's against FA's rules too	by UGuardian	2006-11-19 12:55:59

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)