The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
Canadian Border Guards Run Away by VivianC 2006-11-19 12:55:59
Can this really be defined as "guarding" a border?
[ Reply ]
  I wonder if they were... (obvious punchline) by DesertRat662006-09-25 11:00:10
    Wow, that's incredibly poor taste. by abaron2006-09-25 11:08:34
      I don't know what is worse. by CynicalRyan2006-09-25 11:11:18
        It's unbelievably inane. by Illiad2006-09-25 14:56:47
          You might want to keep this for future pointing by Jeff_UK2006-11-19 12:55:59
      They were unarmed for their own safety? by RetiQlum22006-09-25 11:11:54
        Sorry, reread and it parses poorly. by abaron2006-09-25 11:14:44
          Why leave rather than calling the RCMP? (n/t) by RetiQlum22006-09-25 11:16:03
            That is a good question: by abaron2006-09-25 11:20:37
            Who says they didn't call the RCMP first? (n/t) by Jeff_UK2006-09-25 11:40:52
            Federal Government in Canada is netorious(sp?) by hieraco2006-09-25 11:56:42
        I think what he was saying was: by talon07202006-09-25 11:16:16
      You were given fair warning by DesertRat662006-09-25 11:17:56
        Sorry DR66 but by abaron2006-09-25 11:25:37
          Empathy never stopped anyone from a bad joke. (n/t) by CynicalRyan2006-09-25 11:27:38
            Bingo! You win a Lymerick by DesertRat662006-09-25 11:52:25
          I found it funny. by VivianC2006-09-25 11:42:14
            Clarification? by jiteo2006-09-25 11:44:09
              No. It was the tasteless jest kind. by VivianC2006-09-25 11:46:33
          Empathize?! by DesertRat662006-09-25 12:02:20
            That's what I thought. by abaron2006-09-25 12:09:07
              IMO by DesertRat662006-09-25 12:16:56
          I thought it was funny... by Cural2006-09-25 15:30:50
  they are unarmed. What the story doesnt include by gibuu2006-09-25 11:03:55
    Shouldn't have been necessary by subbywan2006-09-25 11:09:52
      After something like this: by abaron2006-11-19 12:55:59
        Yes. Absolutely. by subbywan2006-09-25 11:22:39
      Their posts? forgive my ignorannce, are they .mil? (n/t) by Jeff_UK2006-09-25 11:23:57
        Yes. Their posts. by subbywan2006-09-25 11:26:18
          If they know they can't offer protection against a by Jeff_UK2006-09-25 11:38:14
            And I may be more sympatheric if there HAD by subbywan2006-09-25 11:40:04
              that IS the definition of 'threat' by Jeff_UK2006-09-25 11:42:06
                No. There's an actual threat and a possible threat by subbywan2006-09-25 11:45:29
                  If the police were 100% sure he was heading to .ca by Jeff_UK2006-09-25 11:50:04
                    Both reports say it was a big maybe. by subbywan2006-09-25 11:52:45
                      Frankly I agree that the guards should be armed. by abaron2006-09-25 11:56:34
                        Yes. They should, or at least have backup. (n/t) by subbywan2006-09-25 12:03:56
                  Once the threat is there, it is too late by Peace_man2006-09-25 11:52:24
                    It's called being a coward. by subbywan2006-09-25 11:54:41
                      Heh. We should be afraid of anything coming by Peace_man2006-09-25 12:05:14
                        Why not? That seems to be the general by subbywan2006-09-25 12:17:05
                          You seem to forget that this truly ISN'T just by Peace_man2006-09-25 12:31:51
                            And you think that makes it *better*? by subbywan2006-09-25 12:33:49
                              Our Customs guys are armed. (n/t) by VivianC2006-09-25 13:13:03
                                Yes. Theirs arn't. (n/t) by subbywan2006-09-25 13:14:11
                        Its not the terrorists you should worry about by joecrouse2006-09-25 15:05:36
                  Actually: by abaron2006-09-25 11:53:42
                    Yes, Which just makes it worse. by subbywan2006-09-25 12:03:14
                      How would the RCMP confirm such a thing? by abaron2006-09-25 12:06:47
                        I'm not blaming the RCMP at all. by subbywan2006-09-25 12:14:44
                          They were told by the RCMP by abaron2006-09-25 12:18:45
                            Ok, marginally better then. by subbywan2006-09-25 12:22:09
          They aren't really civilians by DesertRat662006-09-25 11:57:43
            No they are Civies. by abaron2006-09-25 12:03:43
  Bravely bold Sir Robin ... by run.dll2006-09-25 11:22:20
  Another link, much more unbiased by abaron2006-11-19 12:55:59
    Doesn't make them sound much better. by VivianC2006-09-25 11:57:21
      Not much better but more details by abaron2006-09-25 11:58:57
    Something in that article makes me worried now. by Peace_man2006-09-25 12:07:52
      That is on top of the training they have now. (n/t) by VivianC2006-09-25 12:11:30
      Five Eight Hour Days is sufficient by DesertRat662006-09-25 12:13:03
  What I want to know is by lheggland2006-09-25 16:53:19
  While I'd fire the lot of them for deserting their by kahuana2006-09-25 23:52:53
    Can't fire them ... What they did is *policy*! (n/ (n/t) by subbywan2006-09-26 10:04:55

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)