| Bush seeks immunity for violating war crimes act |
by Illiad |
2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
| So reports the Chicago Sun-Times. Oh dear me. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
bleh,... | by mekkanik_mike | 2006-09-25 00:27:56 |
|
In the US, yes. | by krikkert | 2006-09-25 00:28:21 |
|
Knowing him, he probably wouldn't even be upset to | by finrod | 2006-09-25 00:35:15 |
|
Especially considering his past experiences.. | by stoft | 2006-09-25 01:02:28 |
|
You mean outside Texas? ;P (n/t) | by finrod | 2006-09-25 01:04:57 |
|
He is NOT from Texas! | by ideur | 2006-09-25 01:30:58 |
|
dang-burn carpetbaggers! | by magixtechnica | 2006-09-25 01:35:08 |
|
That many? | by ideur | 2006-09-25 05:37:46 |
|
Mass-a-chew-sets? :) (n/t) | by rorajoey | 2006-09-25 03:58:49 |
|
So? | by VivianC | 2006-09-25 07:51:05 |
|
I'd say there *is* a difference | by MatthewDBA | 2006-09-25 09:16:05 |
|
How much have you traveled in the States?! | by DesertRat66 | 2006-09-25 12:35:14 |
|
I've lived in | by MatthewDBA | 2006-09-25 12:56:57 |
|
Try... | by VivianC | 2006-09-25 15:30:58 |
|
and VivianC how do you know | by zoxer | 2006-09-25 12:46:09 |
|
I go between... | by VivianC | 2006-09-25 15:29:03 |
|
No implications intended: | by stoft | 2006-09-25 12:24:52 |
|
In Europe, 100 miles is a long way. | by krikkert | 2006-09-25 15:09:49 |
|
True (n/t) | by VivianC | 2006-09-25 15:20:55 |
|
yes | by admeralthrawn | 2006-09-25 09:12:55 |
|
What act is he trying to pass through Congress? | by RetiQlum2 | 2006-09-25 00:36:09 |
|
my point exactly (n/t) | by magixtechnica | 2006-09-25 00:51:38 |
|
There is clear mention in the article | by MatthewDBA | 2006-09-25 05:44:05 |
|
hyperbole much? | by magixtechnica | 2006-09-25 00:49:56 |
|
So you vote third party, or not at all? (n/t) | by klar_at_work | 2006-09-25 01:00:44 |
|
Libertarian. My politics are nearly point-for-poi | by magixtechnica | 2006-09-25 01:08:19 |
|
'the rest of your life', eh. | by krikkert | 2006-09-25 01:15:03 |
|
If that happens, I'll start writing in | by magixtechnica | 2006-09-25 01:19:41 |
|
what do you mean changes? | by admeralthrawn | 2006-09-25 09:16:14 |
|
Retroactive laws are unconstitutional? | by leistico | 2006-09-25 10:19:19 |
|
since when does a /president/ write | by magixtechnica | 2006-09-25 15:13:49 |
|
Since the USA hasnt agreed on the | by klar_at_work | 2006-09-25 00:59:01 |
|
It's even worse. | by Qcumber-some | 2006-09-25 01:41:48 |
|
/who/ proclaimed this? (n/t) | by magixtechnica | 2006-09-25 01:45:33 |
|
US Senate. In a "besides" law. Details: | by Qcumber-some | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
That's STILL hyperbole. | by magixtechnica | 2006-09-25 02:53:21 |
|
That's an empty threat, and they know it | by Control | 2006-09-25 01:55:31 |
|
Where is all this coming from? | by magixtechnica | 2006-09-25 02:08:12 |
|
Linky | by Control | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
See | by Qcumber-some | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Eh. | by krikkert | 2006-09-25 02:25:17 |
|
If he were tried in ... Congo, Iraq, Huppeldepup | by SciSSorS | 2006-09-25 01:42:59 |
|
against Pinochet it could have done | by zoxer | 2006-09-25 11:16:04 |
|
wrong. They can't brought to The Hague | by zoxer | 2006-09-25 02:24:02 |
|
I think other countries still can extradite US | by ttlogic | 2006-09-25 04:29:28 |
|
Cause the alternative to NATO | by klar_at_work | 2006-09-25 04:56:57 |
|
This treaty is void. | by Qcumber-some | 2006-09-25 05:39:02 |
|
Pretty biased source, don't you think? | by VivianC | 2006-09-25 07:24:21 |
|
But as to the CONTENT of the "letter"? | by wwill | 2006-09-25 08:13:02 |
|
First let me see the actual text | by MatthewDBA | 2006-09-25 08:15:26 |
|
Clinton wasn't impeached over a stained dress | by DesertRat66 | 2006-09-25 08:41:40 |
|
Okay, he lied about staining the dress, | by nix | 2006-09-25 09:00:51 |
|
Not proven | by VivianC | 2006-09-25 09:14:22 |
|
What content? | by VivianC | 2006-09-25 09:31:38 |
